Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Malik Mujahid (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Malik Mujahid

Abdul Malik Mujahid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage found about him. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 13:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 14:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 14:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete the two links in the above ivote both link to the same article. And this is in large part an interview - not considered an independent source for the purpose of verifying notability per WP:NRV. Mr. Mujahid has less than a one line mention here [1] and here [2]. Mujahid has authored articles in the Huffington Post [3], [4]; but these do not suffice as independent sources, and it is almost as easy to get published in the Huffington Post as writing a personal blog. He is covered in one article [[5], which is a college student newspaper [6], not really a reliable source for biographies on Wikipedia. This would be OK mixed with reliable sources, but there aren't any mainstream sources that cover Mujahid. As far as I can tell, significant independent coverage of this person is not available at this time. Fails GNG, BIO, BLP. ----Steve Quinn (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 20:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He seems to be a respected commentator whose views are sought. He is the author of several commentary pieces for the "WorldPost" as well as giving his views on TV. Meets WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He is quite well-known in the interfaith community, having served as a Chairman of the Parliament of World's Religions. See this Mthange (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep after reviewing available sources again, it seems this person is has made a significant and positive impact in the Muslim community on a large scale. Passes WP:BIO. Oh yeah, I changed my ivote from "delete" to "keep". Please notice that I struck out my former "delete" ivote. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.