Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Haque Bhatti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Haque Bhatti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced biography with no notability claims under WP:ACADEMIC. Kolbasz (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Professor Abdul wahid bhatti? Most probably they are same person or this is a co-ordinate spam? The Legend of Zorro 16:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Clearly the same person. I have redirected your link (which was BLPPRODded, incorrectly, as the subject is not living) to the subject of the AfD. If/when this article is deleted, the redirect can be too. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:00, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Possible A7 speedy deletion — I don't generally like speedying articles about academics, because generally one can say something about even the ones with the weakest records that rises to the level of a claim of significance, but there is absolutely nothing of the sort in the article, let alone anything that would pass WP:PROF. The common names and variable spelling don't make it easy to search but I didn't find anything elsewhere either. At least in this case we can rule out WP:AUTOBIO. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: In Google search no any sign of notabilty of the subject. I suggest deletion per WP:AUTOBIO.Justice007 (talk) 08:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you explain how you think someone dead for eight years wrote an autobiography? —David Eppstein (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete No WP:RS given to establish that he passes WP:GNG --Artene50 (talk) 02:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.