Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Basit Ahmad

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Basit Ahmad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources for anything suggesting notability, I couldn't find any on Google. Doug Weller (talk) 15:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all citations on the page are unreliable (really some sort of bibliography) and my searches turned up nothing better as well. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Also could not find reliable sources on Google. The current sources are only used to support the books he wrote, but the biography section is wholly unsourced (could have been BLP-PRODed). - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as it's worth noting none of the currently listed sources suggest even general notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.