Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abby Sterry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abby Sterry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography of a seventeen year old artist with big dreams but no notability. She's welcome to try again when reliable sources have covered her. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 22:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious delete. She doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST at this time. This is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON: WP:WAYTOOSOON should exist for cases like this. No prejudice against recreation in a few years if there are actual sources and evidence of notability and this is certainly not a judgment on her art. She's young and has plenty of time to be added to the dusty files of Wikipedia. freshacconci talktalk 23:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - Agree with freshacconci; WP:TOOSOON definitely applies. Stalwart111 (talk) 23:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable at all. I do think more articles should include pictures of the subjects at the age of 6, though ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. - Per Wikipedia:Notability (people with cute kitties)#2b: "The person owns at least one cute kitteh." - Serious on: Delete per freshacconci. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 15:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the nomination.--Oceangreenn (talk) 13:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.