Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aave Protocol
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aave Protocol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable per sources' evaluation. Some sources are crypto-related websites. Bloomberg and TechCrunch coverage does not fulfill WP requirements. Old-AgedKid (talk) 09:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Finland. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. First two pages of Google results for “AAVE” (excluding results about African-American Vernacular English) concerning the protocol are from cryptocurrency-specific sites, which I see as indication that it is not generally notable. Article seems written for a cryptocurrency enthusiast audience and is close to being written like an advertisement, in my view, although I am not sure to what extent this is considered when deliberating deletion. Theanswertolifetheuniverseandeverything (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.