Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Screw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Screw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

haven't been able to establish this as Wikipedia-notable Lachlan Foley (talk) 04:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Quite a decent review at AllMusic (which I've added to the article), showing WP:GNG. At worst, redirect to Swans discography. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - a bit odd that it's not actually mentioned in the text of the article on the band, only in a footnote! Deb (talk) 12:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This received plenty of coverage at the time of its release and reached #4 on the UK Independent Chart, which was a pretty big deal in 1986. --Michig (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why delete instead of redirect? This user has created about a dozen of these album deletion requests and has yet to explain why they should be deleted and not simply redirected. Note that if they are redirected, the categories should remain and {{r from album}} should be added. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has secondary sources and charted.--Soul Crusher (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.