Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AM Television

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AM Television

AM Television (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. The first 5 citations are from blogs, ref no 6 is WP:PRIMARY. No WP:SECONDARY, WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG also. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 01:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, Organizations, and India. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 01:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete I found this but it appears to be a passing mention. This seems to be a case of just because the films a company makes are notable, doesn't mean the company is notable. Since there is almost nothing to say about this company, this page is basically a directory of films made by the company, so this page probably doesn't need to exist as per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Chagropango (talk) 14:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.