Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJ Tesler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Tesler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guidelines for biographies. The first source is an unreliable IMDb source, while the second one does not mention the name at all. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete He had one recurring role in television that might have been enough to be a role mentioned for the qualification of an actor that requires two such roles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  21:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  21:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, I just had a look at the work he's done as a producer and director. He's been busy. Enough to make notability. Karl Twist (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Regardless of the CURRENT state of referencing, his filmography and resume seem to meet our notability criteria. He's fairly accomplished, and is pretty prolific. Fieari (talk) 06:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• Neutral I would say imdb isn't a reliable source (you can submit as many of your own shows as you like without verification) and the other cite has no mention of the subject. However, subject is also the founder of ITVFest, a notable festival, so that probably counts for something. But is that enough? I'm too new to make a good judgement on this one. In any case, I don't see much else online to indicate notability worthy of an article. It's a close call. LAroboGuy (talk) 23:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR for that notability and insubstantial references to support to the rest. — Wyliepedia 18:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as his longest career has been as a producer, there's nothing for any actual independent notability as an actor and his Gilmore Girls character was only episodes, so if that's his best known work, that's not saying a lot. SwisterTwister talk 00:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Next to no reliable sources. 79.66.94.252 (talk) 00:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.