Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. J. Mayers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A. J. Mayers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is nothinng more than a resume, no significant coverage and nothing that would meet most of our n criteria. (and definitely fails NAUTHOR) Praxidicae (talk) 19:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete More Billy Hathorn nonesense Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 19:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I WP:PRODded this because independent sources I found sounded press release-y, had no significant coverage, or both. No new information has come to light that would have me reconsider. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Like most Hathorn articles, just WP:REFBOMBed with no actual substance in the sources used. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article is just a resume.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.