Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Dane Bowen Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A. Dane Bowen Jr.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly WP:NN individual failing WP:GNG, WP:DIPLOMAT as a mid-level civil servant and WP:ACADEMIC. Article created days after subject's death by an obvious WP:COI editor. Toddst1 (talk) 17:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MEMORIAL. I could not find any indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable for stand alone article and as stated above, per WP:Memorial. Kierzek (talk) 17:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete much to low level of a government official to be notable, inadequate coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article does not make a convincing case for diplomatic, academic, nor general notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.