Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.S.D. Cagliese Calcio

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.S.D. Cagliese Calcio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years, and I think that is due to lack of notability rather than neglect. It exists, but not enough coverage or significance for a stand-alone article. Boleyn (talk) 08:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tried to source this several months ago and it's not impossible, local coverage exists like [1] [2] [3]. We'd probably have an article on it if the sources were in English, but I can't make a strong argument to keep. SportingFlyer T·C 09:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - played in Serie D, which is sufficient as that is the top level of amateur football in Italy and clubs play in the national cup, the standard benchmark for club notability. There is coverage as shown above. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 10:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw nomination per convincing comments above. Thanks for helping to resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.