Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8Asians
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It doesn't matter who nominated the article for deletion as long as the community agree with the deletion, which it does. I do not see anything wrong with this nomination itself so it seems valid to me. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 08:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 8Asians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non notable website Asod123123 (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Blog site that once triggered a relatively minor controversy because of one entry, otherwise not notable. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 15:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Un-notable website , we cant have an article about each website on the web --B.C say what ? 17:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Will the closing admin please also note that the nominator's contributions show him/her to be a single-purpose account user, using it solely to nominate stuff for deletion.--Vox Humana 8' 00:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable enough to deserve an article. Nlm1515 (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.