Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/82nd Street Academics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jackson Heights, Queens. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

82nd Street Academics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My research shows that this nonprofit fails our Wikipedia guidelines for organizations (but maybe I'm wrong). SarahStierch (talk) 22:30, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I think this organization does not pass WP:NGO. Jim Carter ^(talk) 00:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter ^(talk) 00:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Google search yields sufficient results, e.g. this Times Ledger story about afterschool daycare cut being protested, that I think notability is evident. --do ncr am 13:08, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete The reference supplied by Doncram above picks out this preschool as simply one of many caught up in budgetary cutbacks. I haven't seen anything that singles out this one as particularly special even in NYC itself, much less worldwide. Indeed, it is hard to find anything in the thicket of the usual directory and on-line review hits which nearly any such institution is covered by. If there were real notability here it wouldn't be so hard to find traces of it; as it is, there's no hint in the article that there's anything about it which would attract unusual notice. Mangoe (talk) 15:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Jackson_Heights,_Queens#Community - the material can be sourced, but does not reach general notability due to lack of significant coverage in multiple independent sources. Bearian (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Jackson_Heights,_Queens#Community. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.