Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8-bit (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

8-bit (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes no claim to notability. JDDJS (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is too short. 2602:306:3357:BA0:8EC:C96E:3A67:4DCD (talk) 03:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - 2602:306:3357:BA0:8EC:C96E:3A67:4DCD, the current length of an article is not, has never been, and never will be a deletion criterion. I do note that the article does make one claim to notability, that being an article in Hightimes magazine, which I believe is a reliable source, though I'm not certain. The network I'm currently editing from has hightimes.com blocked, so I can't review the reference. Could someone take a peek for me, please? Thanks. Fieari (talk) 06:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also: WP:TOOSHORT. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per hightimes magazine source that will likely be added soon. notability.BabbaQ (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-I don't know that one single good source necessarily meets Wikipedia's standards for notability found in WP:Music, and don't know if that article alone would constitute notability either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makk3232 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete instead as the Keep vote is suggesting solidity from only 1 listed source, but not actually insinuating how any other better improvements can actually be made. I myself have found nothing else better. SwisterTwister talk 00:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not enough reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Tom29739 ^[talk] 00:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.