Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/77 (band)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 13:42, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 77 (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable band Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 13:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 13:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 13:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added multiple sources to this article. Google searches for "77 Armand Valeta" bring up plenty of articles, reviews, and some interviews, in both English and Spanish. NemesisAT (talk) 19:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:17, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:17, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep A good amount of coverage online. Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as the article has been improved with the addition of multiple reliable sources references such as a staff written AllMusic bio and other coverage so that WP:GNG is passed. The tone of the article, however, is all wrong and so it needs a rewrite but that is not a reason for deletion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per above passes GNG. A good amount of coverage online. Namkongville (talk) 15:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.