Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/54321

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

54321

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG, as far as I can find. Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found these sources for what they are worth. There are no reviews because the film is not released until June 2016 (according to IMDB) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karthik, Janani (22 July 2015). "'54321' is a two-hour psychological thriller". The Times of India.
Subramanian, Anupama (16 July 2015). "54321 has a multiple narrative format". Deccan Chronicle.
Express feature (22 May 2015). "Writing Codes of a Suspense Flick". The New Indian Express.
Subramanian, Anupama (10 January 2016). "Karthik Subbaraj's assistant turns independent". Deccan Chronicle.

Keep perhaps as I was watching this along with all of my other AfDs, seems enough. Draft at best for now until it's set for an acceptable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In looking further:

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) , and

year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer"(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainstream Production

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: 54321 Movie Ragavendra Prasad G.V. Kannan Shabeer Arvin Pavithra Mainstream Production

Keep. Being a completed film with production receiving coverage to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3) even as it awaits its June release. Time to continue improvements over time and through regular editing, not delete. Sorry Boleyn, it just meets WP:NF IMHO. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 17:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: to Boleyn, SwisterTwister and Malcolmxl5 et.al.... The unsourced 3 sentence stub first brought to AFD has benefited by the diligence of others and is now a decently sourced start class article which IMHO now obviously meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3) through having more-than-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Change to keep based on work put in and improvements. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for what is essentially a withdrawal. Your return here is appreciated. . Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As article has been significantly improved since nomination, now clearly meets GNG. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Though I think it needs to have it's title changed to 54321 (film) to avoid confusion. NikolaiHo 19:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikolaiho: done. Now at 54321 (film).

Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.