Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4 My Town (Play Ball)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 4 My Town (Play Ball) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NSONGS No reliable sources or significant coverage; only Billboard charts are cited and it didn’t even rank high enough for notability in that case. Trillfendi (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Charting isn’t everything, but charting on the Billboard Hot 100 (the all-format chart for one of the biggest music markets in existence) is generally a noteworthy accomplishment. Sergecross73 msg me 02:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Typically, when a song is “notable” on the Billboard Hot 100, only the Top 40 is considered a success story. (When I said Billboard charts I meant the website referenced). The Billboard chart “may” be notable according to the Wiki policy but not that it “is”. For this song it’s the latter.Trillfendi (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Top 40 is definitely considered a success story in the industry, sure, but that’s higher than the bare minimum for Wikipedia standards though. That said, yes, obviously it takes more than charting, which is merely a common indicator, which is why I didn’t !vote “keep” but rather just left it as a comment. Sergecross73 msg me 12:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Typically, when a song is “notable” on the Billboard Hot 100, only the Top 40 is considered a success story. (When I said Billboard charts I meant the website referenced). The Billboard chart “may” be notable according to the Wiki policy but not that it “is”. For this song it’s the latter.Trillfendi (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 14:51, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 14:51, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.