Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3D Marketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 05:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3D Marketing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Asserts WP:OR which it fails. Both refs don't mention the term. Possible add for 3D Marketing Concepts. scope_creep talk 22:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a new section in 3D printing. As it stands, the submission is original research (per nom) while the topic does not have the required coverage in reliable independent sources to establish notability. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 00:27, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom, neither reference even uses the allegedly notable phrase.--Rpclod (talk) 00:36, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rpclod & nom - The sources don't even mention "3D Marketing" whatsoever. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was unable to find any reliable sources that could establish notability. Google Books had a few hits, but they were about marketing utilizing 3D film, not printers. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see how this is notable, and it might be WP:DICTIONARY or, if it will become notable in upcoming years, WP:TOOSOON. --Jersey92 (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge with 3D printing. Strawberrie Fields (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article as it currently stands is original research and the term is an unlikely construction. Antrocent (♫♬) 18:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.