Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/33 minutes
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Heritage Foundation. MBisanz talk 22:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
33 minutes
- 33 minutes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not pass WP:NOTFILM. No full length reviews for it other than at its website,and by trivial sources. FingersOnRoids 22:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It looks like possible spam. Even if it is not spam, there is no evidence of notability Aleta Sing 22:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - page moved I've moved it to 33 Minutes: Protecting America, as that's the proper title of the book. flaminglawyer 02:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Book? Its a documentary isn't it? FingersOnRoids 21:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is a bit of fearmongering from the right wing, but nonetheless it's a real documentary created by the The Heritage Foundation. §FreeRangeFrog 10:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Real documentary but still unnotable LetsdrinkTea 20:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Cunard (talk) 23:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; no third party sources here, and there's been five days to add them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect this article to The Heritage Foundation if no sources can be found. Cunard (talk) 08:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.