Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 CONCACAF Gold Cup Group D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW keep‎ . This is one of several AFDs with extremely similar rationales created by the same editor in quick succession after what appears to have been content disputes with no attempt to resolve outside of AFD. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

2023 CONCACAF Gold Cup Group D

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of WP:TOOSOON, but currently does not meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Canada, Cuba, and Guatemala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
KeepTomrtn (talk) 23:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 CONCACAF Gold Cup Group A. Walt Yoder (talk) 00:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A subpage of 2023 CONCACAF Gold Cup which is an international tournament and is clearly notable. Quite standard to set these pages up in advance of the tournament that starts in just over a month. Another bad nomination by Onel5969 who seems determined to waste everybody's time with redundant nominations (and in this case setting up 4 AfDs for the same thing). --SuperJew (talk) 05:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason to delete, all is announced. It starts in two months, so not too soon for me. Kante4 (talk) 08:04, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, pointless to delete it at this stage. This is a significant international tournament and this will certainly receive extensive coverage. There already is coverage on the draw and venue. --Mvqr (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my comments on Group A. Next time please use WP:MULTIAFD so people don't have to post their comments 4 times. BLAIXX 15:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep There are several things that make this nomination wrong:

Numbered list item
The nomination fails WP:NEXIST where that the basis seems to be based on the current sourcing in the article rather than how it could be improved.
The individual groups easily pass GNG with recent media coverage such at this and this.
Having a separate AFD for each group is a waste of everyone's time. There should be one AFD following WP:MULTIAFD.
This is a bog-standard sub-page of 2023 CONCACAF Gold Cup, that we all know will exist when the tournament starts - only 8 weeks until the group stage - and 6 or so until the preliminaries.
The same page for an equivalent tournament - 2019 Copa América Group A was created 5 months ahead of time. I'm sure I could find even earlier. Sure, OTHERSTUFF - but this is utterly routine. Good grief, if one really feels strongly, nominate one, and see how it goes.
User:onel5969 has made several other recent FOOTY AFDs that are snowing keep, and are just absurd - such as 2023–24 EFL League One and even the top Italian league at 2023–24 Serie A (which has just been closed as a SNOW KEEP by User:Jkudlick with an admonishment to the creator.
User:onel5969 has created these, but then even when asked to participate in the discussion, ignores them. I have to feel these are not good faith nominations. Nfitz (talk) 22:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How is this not WP:Disruptive editing? Am I the only person who'd support a topic ban on AFD creation?

Nfitz (talk) 22:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.