Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 International Conference on Imam al-Maturidi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, per the Arabic language sources satisfying the general notability guideline. Steve Smith (talk) 06:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 International Conference on Imam al-Maturidi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

individual conferences are not usually considered to be of encyclopedic importance. DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a normal conference. It's an international conference, with approximately more than 70 attendees from over 20 countries.--TheEagle107 (talk) 15:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Kadzi   (talk) 09:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article references and WP:BEFORE do not meet WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT. All coverage is WP:ROUTINE. // Timothy :: talk 19:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm confused. There are plenty of news articles referenced that easily meet WP:42, e.g. I really don't see what's wrong at all with this, or this (in Arabic), or this (in Farsi). I doubt WP:BEFORE was followed at all here, contrary to what a comment above implies. (Full disclosure: I was canvassed here off-wiki, and have advised the user not to do so again. However, I think it's quite obvious from my contributions that I am not a WP:SPA.) M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 22:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is also good media coverage in Russian (1), (2), (3), (4).--TheEagle107 (talk) 23:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keepThis conference is very important for Maturidi Muslims and the Arabic sources are very good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owais Al Qarni (talk • contribs) 11:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The wall of refs to official Uzbek sources doesn’t tell us much but the Arabic ones tell us it was discussed in the international media at some length and considered important, so passes WP:GNG. Mccapra (talk) 07:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.