Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 FIFA Interactive World Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to FIFA Interactive World Cup. Michig (talk) 07:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 FIFA Interactive World Cup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This event has not happened yet, so maybe it's WP:TOOSOON? Adam9007 (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 19:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to FIFA Interactive World Cup. It's not an issue of WP:TOOSOON - if it were notable, we're within an acceptable time range to create the article. But individual Interactive World Cups are not notable - none of the others have articles and individual tournaments get little coverage outside FIFA's website. So I don't think it's notable, or ever will be notable even after it happens. That all being said, WP:NSEASONS says that in situations like this, it's better to redirect the individual seasons/tournaments to the main article than to delete, and it's a plausible search term, so that's what we should do. It also appears to have already been done with the 2016 FIFA Interactive World Cup, which is a redirect. Smartyllama (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above - not independently notable but possible search term. Giant Snowman 20:10, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - as per previous arguments Spiderone 17:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above, a plausible search term. Fenix down (talk) 09:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.