Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 B36 Tórshavn season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 B36 Tórshavn season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod with the reason given that the season meets WP:GNG as they are playing in the UEFA champions league. In fact they are playing in the first qualifying round. The two games they will play in this round do not meet GNG as they are not games in the competition proper. In general the club do not satisfy the generally held consensus that only football teams playing in fully professional leagues are sufficiently notable in themselves to justify individual season articles. Fenix down (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep via WP:GNG. It is still the Champions League regardless of what round. Quidster4040 (talk) 20:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - please show where consensus is documented that playing in the first qualifying round matches in the champions league means a club's whole season is notable for an individual article. This has never been documented and makes no sense. Why would one or two qualifying games make a season notable? Fenix down (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simply put, it is a one of the world's most prestigious club competitions Quidster4040 (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For which they have yet to qualify. Either way, GNG doesn't work like that. You cant say an entity is doing x therefore GNG is satisfied, where is the significant non-routine coverage of the season off the back of this? Fenix down (talk) 19:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 08:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NSEASONS. Number 5 7 08:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Not playing in a Fully professional league and to play in first qualifying round of Champions League is not notable enough (it is qualifying). If a team has reached the competition proper I would say it can pass WP:GNG but the likelihood if this team doing that is practically zero and article is currently not notable. Qed237 (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability, fails WP:NSEASONS. Giant Snowman 11:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.