Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Vancouver UFO sighting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Vancouver UFO sighting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NFRINGE asks us to consider slow news day stories as not notable enough for standalone articles. I submit that this is a slow newsday story. No lasting impression, no impact beyond any other one-off UFO sighting and not worth having a Wikipedia article for. jps (talk) 17:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I feel that the notability of this event doesn't warrant inclusion into an encyclopedia. No historical importance, no widespread coverage. Wisdom89 ^♦talk 17:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Among UFO sightings that made it into the media, this one was fairly insignificant and had no longer lasting impact. Although it is a well written article, I am afraid that we can afford to lose it. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A one-off hoax of no lasting impact [1]. May be suitable as a brief entry at List of UFO sightings. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of reported UFO sightings, where it is already listed.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.