Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 1. FC Saarbrücken season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2011–12 1. FC Saarbrücken season

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 3. Liga season should technically be able to have a season article written about it, but this one has been unsourced and failed WP:NOTSTATS for nine years. Sending to AfD since a PROD was removed. SportingFlyer T·C 18:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 18:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 18:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - just because a topic can be notable does not mean that it is. Giant Snowman 21:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SportingFlyer, the sources are in the template. Kingjeff (talk) 03:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have no reason to believe it wouldn't pass GNG as it passes NSEASONS and the 3. Liga is a well-followed league, but it is unsourced, isn't complete and I don't have the endeavour to sort this article out. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - if this were a brand new article, I would strongly recommend sending it to draft given the fact that it is barely sourced and also incomplete. Unfortunately, it isn't new. Some of the Kicker articles are fairly lengthy so this topic may pass GNG but I would certainly agree that it shouldn't be in the main space at this moment in time. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.