Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as a verifiable future event. Turnstep 06:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see how a sporting event to be held four years into the future deserves a page. The {{future sport}} template is all very well, but this is ridiculous. Viridae^Talk 02:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Deprodded so listed here. Viridae^Talk 02:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Given that it's an annual event, four years in the future starts to look like a crystal ball. BigHaz 02:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per 2012 Summer Olympics or 2016 Summer Olympics. Rather than being "ridiculous", the planning for major future sporting events is of interest to most sports fans, frequently covered in the press and should be included here. --JJay 02:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as deprodder. The tournament venues have been selected. Crystalballism does not apply. --DarkAudit 02:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, crystalballcruft. User:Zoe|^(talk) 02:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, and then delete 2012 Summer Olympics or 2016 Summer Olympics also. Crabapplecove 02:54, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Championship until the venues for the first four rounds of the 2010 tournament have been verified. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Venue information here: http://tulanegreenwave.cstv.com/genrel/070606aaa.html --DarkAudit 03:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and stubify per my argument in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament. The venues have been selected and verified. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 07:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel article is all the proof needed that the venues have been selected. Nate 10:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wasn't arguing proof. I was arguing point. What is ths point of keeping these as their own seperate article when they are so far into the future? Viridae^Talk 10:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is just too far in the future, nothing solid yet. rootology 19:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: All this is is a plan, and the best laid plans of mice and men gang aft aglee. Geogre 20:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep we have 2008 Olympics, 2012 Olympics, 2016 Olympics, don't we? Carlossuarez46 21:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Considering this is an annual event keeping this one is like having an article on the 2028 olympics! Viridae^Talk 22:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Major sporting events with chosen venues are a definite keep. Vickser 22:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.