Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Mexicali earthquake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Mexicali earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Not of lasting significance, no deaths, injuries, or damage. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. -- —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails the Rule of 7. Carrite (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a place for news. There is no evidence of lasting impact, no deaths. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This could be mentioned in Laguna Salada Fault, but as Mike and Armbrust point out, there's no lasting significance to this event. Mandsford 14:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, but I laugh of "the rule of 7"'s awkwardness. Diego Grez (talk) 22:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We agree again, so far we're 3-for-3... Carrite (talk) 01:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thee is no rule of 7, and we have many earthquakes of similar magnitude. Earthquakes necessarily have lasting geological effects on the natural world. DGG ( talk ) 02:23, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because there is no reason to keep this and 5.8 is fairly regular around here and any earthquake that small should show some kind of damage and this really doesn't because they happen all the time and people sleep through them. 207.81.170.99 (talk) 07:24, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.