Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Tampa Bay Storm season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Tampa Bay Storm season

I don't think the arena football league is a big enough league to have individual team's have season articles.

So I am also nominating all the other arena football league team season articles.

BUC (talk) 17:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please let us know when you make those nominations. Mandsford (talk) 22:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. At worst, it's a split of information we'd have in Tampa Bay Storm otherwise. Besides, the AFL is (or was, depending on if they come back next year) the highest level of arena football out there, so I'm not sure how much "bigger" you can get. I'm taking this as just an AfD for the one article, but such a mass nom would be a guaranteed trainwreck anyway I'd think... BryanG (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article needs work, but according to Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Individual_seasons "Articles can be created on individual seasons of the top leagues as they are notable." The AFL qualifies as a top league. Thus the subject of the article is notable. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The AFL qualifies as a top league? BUC (talk) 18:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tampa Bay Storm, honestly this is just a list of incomplete stats which fails WP:NOT#STATS, SPORTS is a failed guideline (trust me I know as I was the one who created it, I want it recreated but this isn't the proper page). I just don't see much information for a seperate article. Secret ^account 12:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The AFL does in fact qualify as a top league, making this an obvious keep.--Giants27 ^T/C 21:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.