Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1:600 scale
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of scale model sizes. Missvain (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 1:600 scale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Topic does not pass WP:GNG. Currently, the article is not reliably sourced. A search only comes up with results showing the the 1:600 scale is used by some models, but no in-depth coverage discussing the significance of the 1:600 scale itself. Rusf10 (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep based on this VFD, we would have to have all the many other articles about scales on VFD as well. And, it's not just some models, many brands use this scale.Antonio El Muchacho de los Ojos Tristes Martin (di?) 22:23, May 5, 2021 (UTC)
- That's WP:ALLORNOTHING. Why does this article specifically meet WP:GNG?--Rusf10 (talk) 22:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete- fails the GNG. The fact that this scale is used is of no consequence: since it's never discussed in detail in reliable sources, it has to go. If the same is true for other articles, they should also be deleted. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)- Comment I added an article on ESPN, which is a reliable source.Antonio Toy Model Martin (que que??) 05:32, May 9, 2021 (UTC)
- That's a trivial mention, in my view. It states in passing that a model uses it, but there's nothing beyond that. The GNG requires significant coverage. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- No objection to a merge to List of scale model sizes. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I added an article on ESPN, which is a reliable source.Antonio Toy Model Martin (que que??) 05:32, May 9, 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Could we merge several 1:n00 scale pages?--SilverMatsu (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Excellent idea! Take some of the info on each page and include it on the new page...Antonio the product of a merge Martin (whats up?) 05;56, May 12, 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Merge to existing page at List of scale model sizes. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 18:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Merge per el cid, el campeador and Extraordinary Writ. As another topic, it looks like we'll need to merge 1:200 scale as well, but we might need another discussion to do this.--SilverMatsu (talk) 02:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Merge scope_creepTalk 23:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.