Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12301 Wilshire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

12301 Wilshire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, unremarkable building in Los Angeles. Acroterion _(talk) 16:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems like spam to try and sell/rent the building. Not notable, not mentioned in reliable sources. Angryapathy (talk) 17:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - MLS listing masquerading as an article. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's a building. It's in Los Angeles. It's for sale. And? DarkAudit (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per OrangeMike Newt ^(winkle) 20:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I feel sorry for the real estate company whose link has been posted here and the person who created the article. What an embarrassment. Mandsford (talk) 19:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not really sure what the harm is in having articles on buildings like this... they can certainly be informative, albeit to a small niche of users. Nevertheless I realize "harm" or lack thereof is a weak argument and consensus is clearly against these sorts of articles. There's nothing "notable" about this building in Wikipedia terms. --Sancho Mandoval (talk) 20:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete. --Epeefleche (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unremarkable building, not seeing how this could be anything but the spam it currently is RadioFan (talk) 02:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not Delete not spam, this will be a remarkable building once the redevelopment is complete. it is the only building to be completely redone during the longest recession since the great depression. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.107.166.244 (talk) 02:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.