Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/121st Weather Flight
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 113th Wing. This seems the most agreeable redirect target from the discussion, as there is no indication of independent notability here. Interested users can feel free to adjust the redirect target and/or merge any useful information to the target page as the article history has been left intact. ~ mazca talk 02:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
121st Weather Flight
- 121st Weather Flight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not have enough significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject to be considered notable. Generally units of this size (smaller than a squadron/company) are not considered notable by WP:MILUNIT, nor is it a combat unit. — -dainomite 01:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — -dainomite 01:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Why on earth would the fact that it isn't a combat unit be relevant? Combat units are no more inherently notable than non-combat units. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that part of my statement was misinterpreted. I didn't mean delete it just because it isn't a combat unit. Non-combat units more often than not lack notability due to a general lack of coverage from independent or reliable sources. — -dainomite 17:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to 121st Fighter Squadron. Redirect to notable parent command authority.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to 113th Wing, as the 231st Combat Communications Squadron etc. were also served by this Flight, but all fall under the 113th's umbrella. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:10, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.