Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(I Got No Kick Against) Modern Jazz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 02:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(I Got No Kick Against) Modern Jazz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unref article, tagged for notability for 5 years Boleyn (talk) 11:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It took some effort but I found a fair bit of coverage in Billboard, plus 3 other reviews across a range of sources, and some other bits and pieces, which I added to the article. There were suggestions of additional reviews in jazz publications, but very few jazz mags from 1995 are online even in the paid-for databases. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 15:39, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, given the added refs from Colapeninsula. The title bugs me, honestly, but I'm not sure what can be done there. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 17:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Given the fact that one of the songs on the album was nominated for a Grammy award shows a certain amount of notability in my eyes. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 14:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.