Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Śajvo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 09:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Śajvo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find much in the way of WP:SIGCOV, and I think it probably fails WP:GNG. I think it's also been auto-translated from Ukrainian. PepperBeast (talk) 14:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The name should be Syaivo according to most Eng. sources. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 02:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. After reading the auto-translated versions of all the cited sources, it's still not clear to me what the controversy over this bookstore is about nor why it is notable enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.