Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Øivind Johnsen

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Øivind Johnsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hasn't improved since prod 5 years ago. WP:BEFORE fails to find anything in English and I don't read Norwegian. He might be notable - if there are sources about him, but the article sports none, and the no wiki article is not much better, through it links a WP:OBIT in a newspaper (but we generally want to see more sources than a single obit). Thoughts? Keep and wait another few years or regretfully call it time? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - WP:OBIT isn't a policy, guideline, or essay - it's a site for deceased Wikipedians that says nothing about how obituaries should be used. Why are you citing it here? There is no bar on using obituaries to support notability - indeed, they're often the ultimate in WP:SIGCOV and it makes absolutely no sense to exclude them in assessing notability. Not knowing Norwegian should make you more careful in this case - indeed, there is no need to assess articles that you do not feel ready to investigate. At the very least based on machine translation I see WP:SIGCOV in the following references: 1 2 3 4. FOARP (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.