Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/¡Uno!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by the nominator. I know that the person involved in a discussion should not close it, but the problems kept in the nom have been addressed. If anyone thinks that this should be redirected, it can be discussed on the talk page. Thanks! (non-admin closure) →TSU ^tp* 11:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¡Uno!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Article is unsourced speculation~~Rich^(Contribs)/_{(Talk to me!)} 03:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Here's a brand new reliable source confirming the basics, clearly authorized by Green Day which appears on the MTV website. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect (to Green Day page). --Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 05:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Yes, the album cover is released but nothing more info is there available other then the release date. No where it is stated that which songs will be in the album so keeping a list of them can possibly "mis-leading" (I have removed the list as it was somewhat like WP:OR). It should be redirected for now and when the details are available official or via reliable sources, we can make a good article which wont have "suspected" material. →TSU ^tp* 06:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the efforts in improving make me change the vote now. It clearly passes WP:GNG with having ample of WP:RS and content. I suggest withdrawn as the concerns are fixed. →TSU ^tp* 09:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this article survives AFD then it needs to be renamed according to Wikipedia:Naming_conventions#Special_characters, The album has not been released so far, its said to be releasing in september 2012 , WP:CRYSTAL ?? --DBig Xray 10:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not going to go either way and say you should remove or keep it, however I would like to bring light to the Grand Theft Auto V page on Wikipedia. Almost no "real" information about the game has been officially submitted by Rockstar, however that game still has its own article. Styk0n (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Green Day (for now). While most of the information in the article is certainly verifiable through reliable sources, almost none of it directly pertains to ¡Uno!. The first half of the article is about the three-album project in general, and the second half is basically a description of a YouTube video. Fezmar9 (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Green Day is a very famous band, and yes, there new album is coming up. There are many sources and text. So why not let the page stay? VegetaSaiyan...going Super Saiyan 5! (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: You know, for a band as big as Green Day, this article is actually very well written and not a single detail in the article is unreferenced. There's actually no absolute reason to delete this article, and unless you want to create an article for the trilogy in general (in which I highly discourage you to do so), the information about the trilogy is talking about Uno aswell. Don't forget, this is a three piece work. RazorEyeEdits (talk) 07:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: If the album is coming up surely and there are references, the article is correct, is a great stupidity to delete an article which will be newly created some months later. In Wikipedia always have been articles for coming up albums. I hate the delete obsession in some users. Sorry for my poor english, thanks for policies of Aznar and Rajoy, I have no money for learn it. tot-futbol (talk) 10:37, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: We got some concrete information on this, plus why delete it if we're going to recreate it in a month or two?108.231.169.13 (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep The article is no longer "unsourced speculation". The album has a confirmed release date, title and cover. It also contains background and recording information. Statυs (talk) 04:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep I'm happy to withdraw this nomination, my initial concerns with the article have been satisfied. Whether the article's creation was appropriate at the time is another matter. Rich^(Contribs)/_{(Talk to me!)} 09:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.