Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Endlessdan
Appearance
2007 Election status
- Nominations are closed.
- Voting has closed. (ended 16 December 2007, 23:59 UTC)
- Jimbo Wales has appointed the new Arbitration Committee members.
- Voting for me is a vote for straight stone cold chillin. No gimmicks needed. EndlessDan 17:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Endlessdan (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Questions for the candidate
- Support or Oppose this candidate
Support
- Moral Support, for actually wanting to do this. This fellow candidate appriciates your enthusiasm. Wizardman 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- —trey(wiki) 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- It was very bold of you to do this, and for that, you get my support. Kwsn (Ni!) 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Nice answers to questions. Tim Q. Wells 00:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Quite sincerely, what the arbcom needs. Breath of fresh air. Martinp23 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- For actually wanting the hellish job that is arbcom (and not being an ego mad nutjob like some who've wanted it) ... you've got my vote. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- east.718 at 00:33, December 3, 2007
- I feel like shaking the tables of ArbCom and electing someone more chill than I could ever wish to be. MessedRocker (talk) (write these articles) 00:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, makes a mockery of these elections. —Random832 00:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Moral support – Makes these elections less dull. —Animum § 00:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yamanbaiia 00:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Even if you don't get elected, feel free to apply some straight stone cold chillin to editing disputes. GracenotesT § 00:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Makes a balance for the serious side and a (nonexistent) funny side. PrestonH 01:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Moral Support sh¤y 01:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- --Docg 01:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- krimpet⟲ 02:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- I did not expect to support. Húsönd 02:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- *votes for straight stone cold chillin* Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 03:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Videmus Omnia Talk 03:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- :) Snowball support for a guaranteed fail, thanks for the stone cold answers to your questions DUDE. --Cactus.man ✍ 03:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strangely more with it than many others. Why the hell not? --Bdj 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- He'd only be one voice of 15. It'd be nice to laugh at ArbCom every now and then instead of always holding my head and crying; an outsider's perspective (as seen in #3 here) would be valuable. --JayHenry 03:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- You appear to be more sensible than some of the other candidates running in this election. Spebi 04:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Moral support. I dorftrottel I talk I 05:21, December 3, 2007
- Strong support. Seems very reasonable. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- - Nice enthusiasm. ScarianTalk 08:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Neil ☎ 10:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Grue 13:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- The enlightened take things lightly. the wub "?!" 14:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed they do WilyD 15:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Kwsn. Acalamari 17:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- support --Rocksanddirt 18:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Moral support OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Someone this amusing is surely highly intelligent - ergo will make a good arbitrator. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 18:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support. I can understand why people are voting to oppose, but can't understand the lack of a sense of humor of some people. MookieZ 19:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose through support of this candidacy.--Isotope23 talk 20:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support - fight the Cabal, man! Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 20:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Some people take themselves too seriously. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 22:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support-Dureo 23:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Will make reading ArbCom decisions much more enjoyable :) Kaldari 00:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- He makes the ArbComm elections not suck. The committee needs diverse points-of-view and humor. Otherwise, it will become a dull and frustrating place. Any bad proposal can be voted down (as they often are) and he has never been mean-spirited. maclean 01:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support Moral support. Actually, I think making him a clerk could be a good idea if he really wanted to do that. MrMurph101 03:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Support Making Arbcom a joke you say? Well, I think we already have debacles like Allegations of apartheid and Attack sites to thank for that. --arkalochori |talk| 04:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support I like to chill. Atropos 05:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support. I love the platform! --ffroth 05:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support I love the chutzpah! Xdenizen 05:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support I vote for third-party candidates occasionally, too. --Lukobe 08:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support, just for the attitude. Dan100 (Talk) 13:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support. We need ArbCom members from outside the wiki-"establishment", who will be genuinely independent. (This is not a joke, it's actually a serious support.) WaltonOne 15:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Go for it. — CharlotteWebb 20:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Moral Support ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 20:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- I believe in you Emericanbuddha||talk|
- Pass the green cookies and warm milk. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 00:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- ~Sasha Callahan (Talk) 04:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Grandmasterka supports the "minor party" candidate! This guy has the philosophical prowess and intestinal fortitude I'm looking for, although I love Eli Manning. ;-) Grandmasterka 06:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support for his adventurous spirit. A much better candidate than some who are making a more conventional run for the position. DGG (talk) 06:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- 举 Ageru! - Mailer Diablo (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support Paul Beardsell (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support semper fictilis 15:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support ROFL. Skinwalker (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support because Endlessdan opposes - consider your vote neutralized. (can't believe I'm hitting Save Page) .... Keeper | 76 19:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- My boy Walton has this one quite right. Joe 21:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support per User:Secret. His answers to voters' questions put my user subpage to shame.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 02:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Moral Support -- Ferkelparade π 17:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support we need more people like this guy. --Explodicle (talk) 18:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support YES. Everyone loves a court jester, right? Right?? Nobody of Consequence (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- This chilling of the stone cold, it must happen. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Redstarsldr (talk) 02:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Good attitude.
- User does not have suffrage Nick (talk) 02:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- moral support, as I certainly agree that "on a whole everyone needs to be chill". -- phoebe/(talk) 09:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support, unlike some others, you don't take yourself too seriously... something that ArbCom needs badly! Lankiveil (talk) 09:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC).
-- My feeling is that a shot of DGAFism may be just what ArbCom needs. This is Wikipedia, not life or death; You get that. --Ssbohio (talk) 16:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Outsiders desperately needed. Eliot (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yours is the chillin' which will pierce the heavens! --Gwern (contribs) 21:29 7 December 2007 (GMT)
- Support KleenupKrew (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Word Blahaccountblah (talk) 17:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- User got caught up in the sock net and, thus, can't vote. Harsh. Blahaccountblah (talk) 17:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Jab843 (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support, because my stone has been feeling a little warm of late. Ashdog137 (talk) 02:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support - I am amazed to see an ArbCom candidate who not only doesn't take himself too seriously, but in fact has a sense of humor! ugen64 (talk) 06:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Mike R (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support with proviso. I'm concerned about the amount of chillin' ArbCom can take. As such, I believe that this election should accept 6 candidates rather than 5, and the stone-cold chair would not posses suffrage lest others' votes be overwhelmed. SnowFire (talk) 01:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong suppoert. Bacchiad (talk) 04:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but to meet my strict ArbCom voting standards you must have at least 50 edits in the Help talk: namespace and improve your chillin' percentage by 15%. szyslak 09:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support wbfergus Talk 20:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support, since SPUI isn't running this year, why not!--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) (talk) 22:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support. No gimmicks needed indeed! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 05:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support Has some strong points. Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 17:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- straight stone cold chillin support --Hdt83 Chat 05:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support merely on the stance that he was smart enough to vote against himself. --Son (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Symbol_oppose_vote.svg/15px-Symbol_oppose_vote.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Symbol_oppose_vote.svg/15px-Symbol_oppose_vote.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Symbol_oppose_vote.svg/15px-Symbol_oppose_vote.svg.png)
Oppose -Dureo 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. AvruchTalk 17:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Avruch does not have suffrage 24.0.64.193 (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Just not enough stone-cold chillin. Frozenbrains (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- User had fewer than 150 mainspace edits as of 1 November 2007, and thus lacks suffrage ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 04:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. You iz not serious candidate, and Arbcom are serious matter. MrVibrating (talk) 15:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Moo
- C'mon, mate...you know you want to:)--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)