Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/October 2006/Uzumaki
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to: My talk page and user page
Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer:
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: Personal Attack
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: I have tried leaving them messages on my talk page and theirs, asking them to stop. BhaiSaab has been derisive and continued his not-good-faith mischaracterizations of my edits. Jean-Philippe's response was to post a derogatory picture of a plastic duck and state his intention to "I'll get the ducky where I want it even if I have to tear his cute little yellow head off". JBKramer simply does not respond.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: I need some help. I only want to edit and improve Wikipedia and have had good relations even with those I disagree with on the Naruto pages, but these three users are increasingly incivil and harassive.
Summary:
I want these users to stop harassing me. They have mischaracterized my edits, filed false "warnings" on my talk page, and continue to do so even after being asked to stop.
Discussion:
This request should be disregarded - it was made by a disruptive sockpuppet. BhaiSaab talk 21:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- This user is lying about me, repeatedly and maliciously. He is doing so even after I told him that I would not edit his precious article any more, he can own it if he wants to. This is clear harassment. All it would take is for him to leave me alone, but he refuses to do so. Uzumaki 21:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- He's been blocked for being a sockpuppet. BhaiSaab talk 01:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer:
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer:
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer:
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer:
AMA Information
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
- None assigned.
- User has been blocked indefinitely as a sock. See [1]. Closed -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 23:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)