User talk:Yintan/Archives/2013/April

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

	Who I am
	Don't judge me about who I am Meerahboo05 (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not following you at all. Care to enlighten me? Yintan²  08:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

So who was he??? Basket _Feudalist 10:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

There has been officially any second Republic in Italy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.19.234.201 (talk) 09:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

I think it's better to discuss that on the article's Talk page before you start removing all mentions of it from the article. Could save you a lot of work ;-) Yintan²  09:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

yes I did explain, check the link -.- http://jalopnik.com/bugatti-veyron-super-sport-stripped-of-worlds-fastest-470992327 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.130.246.118 (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Removing two paragraphs without explanation and dumping a link at the bottom of the page[1] is not how it works. Yintan²  10:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Can I just say thank you for reverting those useless edits on that page? I'll warn you though, some of his "sources" are not accurate either so be aware lol again thanks. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 23:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Useless edits? And which sources are not accurate? Most were sourced, and you are one to talk about inaccurate sources. Only unsourced portions should be reverted. Have a little bit of respect, 'Brotha'.208.69.244.9 (talk) 04:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Maybe you guys should argue about the sources on the article's Talkpage(?) Yintan²  08:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

I tried to get them to do it but they don't follow the rules. ;) Anyways, as an encyclopedia entry, I didn't feel some of the information was too necessary if people wanted to know Little Richard on a casual sense. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 13:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok, under 'Research evidence' the "FOR EXAMPLE" says Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo made this following claim:

'his claim that elderberry can be used as a remedy for the common flu lacks scientific evidence and may be misleading'.

which there is no reference to the source of this quote which is said to be claimed by Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo, which I have counted that claim with facts from The Eat right 4 your type Complete blood type Encyclopedia Copyrighted 2002 by Hoop-A-Joop on page 539 under Fruit/Fruit Juice you will find Elderberry (Dark Blue/Purple): which reads in the book...

Elderberry (Dark Blue/Purple):

Group A: Neuteral, Non-Secretor Variant: BENEFICIAL Group B: Neuteral, Non-Secretor Variant: BENEFICIAL Group AB: Neuteral, Non-Secretor Variant: BENEFICIAL Group O: Neuteral

There is no denotes in any of the groups that mention any of the Blood groups if they consume Elderberry's that there is a direct link to preventing the Common Flu other than BENEFICIAL, as to how elderberry are BENEFICIAL isn't put into details but BENEFICIAL means that particular food is good for you and helps you body which just a note a human can consume allot of food that is said to help prevent the Common Flu take an Orange and it peel for example. which is noted in the book which you just may want to buy a copy for a reference seeing your managing this stub because it can be found on page 541.

Orange/ Orange Juice..

Group A: Avoid: Increases Polyamine or indican levels; inhibits proper gastric function or blocks assimilation.

Group B: NEUTRAL Group AB: Avoid: Increases polyamine or indican levels. Group 0: Avoid: Increases polyamine or indican levels; metabolic inhibitor.

Want to know about, lets say chicken soup, I can look that up also but with out a direct reference to the claim that is being said that Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo made the claim, and the claim was 'his claim that elderberry can be used as a remedy for the common flu lacks scientific evidence and may be misleading' is unsupported and not factual.

Like many claims I have read on Cellular Nutrition (<- get that hint real quick) are not factual also, but in this case for this stub it will become factual and less one sided and over opinionated, and you might want to revert my edit back for it doesn't show the unsupported reference, unless you want the open source wikipedia to only show unsupported references, which isn't allowed just to let you know you have to show a reference.

If it doesn't have a reference then it is hearsay and it isn't allowed on Wikipedia, period.

here's another that will be soon deleted just to give you a heads up..

"There is a lack of scientific evidence supporting the associations between disease states and ABO blood types as mentioned on (Dr.)Peter D'Adamo's website.[16] A search of PubMed under the author's name does not yield any peer-reviewed articles with data to support his claims."

There could be a reason for the above error because all the medical references that are noted in the Eat right 4 your type Complete blood type Encyclopedia Copyrighted 2002 by Hoop-A-Joop that was written by Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo are not on PubMed and the references used are not written by Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo, as noted in the USERS GUIDE page XVII -Scientific References- which reads:

"There are hundreds of scientific study references throughout the encyclopedia, appearing at the END OF EACH SECTION. Most of the articles cited may be accessed through Medscape's MEDLINE service www.medscape.com., you do have the book right?

which if you want me to go into a rant about the lack of scientific evidence, it is overly apparent you HAVEN'T READ THE BOOK and your written a 'review' about the title you haven't read and you editing who, me?..get real I have the book right here in front of me and you should by one.

^[1]

Timeholder (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

One, I have no idea what you are talking about,

two, all I did was remove your usersignature from the article, as you can see here [2]

three, next time you leave a message here, please don't overwrite other people's texts. Yintan²  07:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

on #3 I didn't knowingly remove anyone else text other than what I was trying to add which in doing so I made a mistake and then changed what I did when I saw it was wrong, which when doing so what was added to my mistake 'the who r u ' comment I erased which wasn't done with malice intent, navigating this <text editor> is like riding the 6,000 pound elephant in the china shop. sorry.Timeholder (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for that. I have edited this page before, however I have never referenced as I did not know how. I did notice that reference [6](new York times) would be sufficient for the Coptic majority in the US claim, found in the religion section. I'm sorry but I'm just learning now how to reference and i did put the wrong one by accident, although I think I have fixed it now. I'm going to attempt to add a new reference but don't worry if I do make any mistakes as I will fix them before I leave.

No problem. Have you tried using the 'preview' button? That could prevent some unpleasant surprises. Yintan²  17:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes I removed the content because if you read it, it has little to do with the British identity in Scotland, just Scottish separatist propaganda, if you also read the titles, they both conflict with each other as they both have "politics" within the actual information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.184.106 (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

You might want to discuss such big deletions on the article's Talk page first. Yintan²  16:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yintan, Can you please delete Prince Abdi article as the information on Wikipedia is not accurate. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.122.48 (talk) 00:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

The article looks fine to me but if you think it should be deleted you can list it at WP:AFD. Yintan²  08:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

2.222.122.48 you have repeatedly been asked to bring any issues of contention to this talk page, instead of wiping the article. As has been posted on your talk page, the subject of the article, may deal directly with the Wikipedia Foundation and request that inaccurate article material is altered or removed. See WP:OTRS. The material given in the article is referenced. Changes cannot be made to inaccurate details unless there is, somewhere, a process of discussion either on an editor talk page, the article talk page or with the Wikipedia Foundation. You've blanked the Prince Abdi article eight times without saying what's wrong with it or commenting on the talk page. If you continue to remove material without giving specific reason, you may be blocked. Span (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Yintan,

You wrote:

"Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Atlantic Ocean, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "

I don't know how else to leave you a message on this page other than editing it.

The only reason I edited the Atlantic Ocean page was to make a point to someone that Wikipedia is unreliable as a source for information. This is because anyone and everyone can edit it to say anything at all, with no expert knowledge or research necessary.

Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.31.191 (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, and I can prove that glass can break by smashing your windows. That's no reason to do it, though. Yintan²  08:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I edited the Lawrence Dennis article because the line in question: "He advocated that capitalism in America after the Great Depression, arguing that capitalism was doomed." .. seemed to me a grammatical and logical absurdity. Also, Lawrence Dennis is quite clearly a fascist and anti-capitalist, from what I understand.

By digging around a bit in the history of the page, I found that for the vast majority of its existence, the first instance of "that capitalism" in the sentence was some formulation of "fascism" or "Social fascism". It was only recently changed (i.e. in the third last edit before mine), with no explanation - again, to what seemed like an absurdity. I invite you to examine it the same way I did, and see if you agree.

50.100.175.250 (talk) 03:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

My bad, your edit was correct. I've restored it, sorry about the mix up. Yintan²  08:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

The inhabitants of Gomel call their city Gomel, not 'Homel'. I cannot imagine why would you have a problem with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.210.138 (talk) 13:25, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

I have no problem with G/Homel, but please, if you make changes like that explain them in the edit summary (and add a ref if possible). And if you call me a Nazi twat[3], your credit/believability doesn't exactly improve. Thanks. Yintan  13:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

True, appologies for that. I just run into a series of revisionist claims in Wikipedia articles on WWII. I assumed your intervention was along those lines, so reacted in haste. Sorry about that. As for the reference, plese see the article on Gomel, as the city is called in English language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.210.138 (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Problem solved, I guess. Happy editing ;-) Yintan  13:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Cheers mate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.210.138 (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for fighting vandalism on Wikipedia! Arctic Kangaroo 15:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Yintan  16:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Peace be upon you.I previously changed the edit in Maryam (sura) "encounters the male angel" and changed it to "encounters the angel Gabriel disguised as a male"(if i remember correctly) because in mainstream Islam, we believe that angel is a genderless creature, thus saying it is a male is a bit offencive. Surah 19, verse 17 "And she took, in seclusion from them, a screen. Then We sent to her Our Angel, and he represented himself to her as a well-proportioned man." We believe that angel is a genderless creature that can transform to a man to communicate with the human world such as the case with Mary. http://islam.about.com/od/angels/a/Angels-In-Islam.htm to know more about angel. Thus, i insist it to be changed back but i am powerless here and only clarifying my belief, my mistake is because of my weakness and my correctness is because of God(the exalted) grace.may god be with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.210.15.209 (talk) 17:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Is an angel 'representing himself as a man' different from a 'male angel'? I think it would be best if you brought that up on the article's Talk page and reach consensus about the exact description there. Until then I would suggest to keep the current decription in the article but that's just my opinion. Yintan  18:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Please re insert the reference to the Nathan Carter version of Wagon Wheel.I don't understand what right you have to remove material fro ma site.It is obvious you have no knowledge of the Irish Country Music scene. I am a broadcaster in Ireland and would not have included the reference unless it was correct. Nathan Carter is a leading Irish Country music star. A native of Liverpool he now resides in Ireland and fronts a country music band. His version of 'Wagon Wheel' is not dis similar to the Darius Rucker version which was released 12 months after the Irish version. It is also available on a new CD titled WAGON WHEEL on the SHARPE RECORD LABEL Cat,No:NCMC002Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). Mooneypc (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Nothing to do with rights and I'm not saying your addition was incorrect. It's about notability. Please read WP:BIO. Yintan  21:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Yintan. When I had previously edited the page two years ago, the only real source of information was Collins' Myspace page. Two years later, Myspace has become a defunct source of info in relation to his Facebook page. His official website doesn't actually provide any updates or information, which leads me to believe it is also outdated. I think his Facebook page is an appropriate source of information about Simon, as much of it seems promotional and professional in regards to his musical career rather than his personal life. It's also the most frequently updated site in regards to his musical career. Let me know what you think. Thanks a lot.Vuzor (talk) 09:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Vuzor. Facebooklinks are generally not added because they aren't open to everybody (you need to join Facebook to access them). There's more info on this at WP:EL. Cheers,  Yintan  09:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

I beg to differ. If you don't mind me adding in my two cents, Facebook is very much used as a source... A reliable one. Things have changed I guess. See WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. Best, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

And unless the Facebook link is private or something, it CAN be viewed without an account. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

It's not about reliability. There's already a link to his offical .com on the article and a link to his band's official .com too. Adding another Facebook link seemed a bit much. Per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, indeed.  Yintan  09:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

There's no train to rush for... Nothing much serious, but look carefully before reverting somebody's legitimate edit... Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Now that's what we call a stupid mistake. :-(  Yintan  09:21, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

You sure reply fast... I barely can catch my breath! :P keep up the active editing! ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Johnny B goode was developed from a similar song origionly played by a highscool band called The Starlights that played at a event that Chuck Berry was present at. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.29.210.254 (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

It wasn't Chuck, anyway, it was Marvin "your cousin Marvin Berry, hey you know that new sound you were looking for... well listen to to this!" Basket _Feudalist 13:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure. Point me to a verifyable source that says your "Marty Mcfly"[4] wrote Johnny B Goode, and I'll believe you. Until then I'll stick, like the rest of the world, with Chuck Berry. Yintan  21:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

https://www.duedil.com/company/06761949/jasper-garvida-ltd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.36.86 (talk) 13:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Add it to the article then, it's no use here :)  Yintan  13:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Just changed one of my edits to Ramsey Grammar School Page. Fully referenced. Not Vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.18.138.75 (talk) 11:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid that being a gamer and "Self Proclaimed Hyper Carry" isn't enough to be listed on Wikipedia. Please check out WP:NOTABILITY.  Yintan  11:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Greetings. Lots of silliness going on this morning.  FrostedΔ14  12:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

You can say that again...  Yintan  12:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Just wanted to say that your corrections to my edits were ASTONISHINGLY FAST. Well done. I planned on deleting them as soon as I took a screen shot. Childish, I admit. Either way, VERY WELL DONE on your part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.154.119.64 (talk) 13:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks but next time you want to play, use the sandbox at WP:SANDBOX, please.  Yintan  13:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I think User:TheRedPenOfDoom have multiple accounts. here proof[5] i don't no how to report this. Ventagecollection (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2013‎ (UTC)

Also User:Truthdrive and User:Thilakan 1980 because both these users are only editing and promoting the article Kamal Haasan here,here. Can you report this i am waiting for your reply. Ventagecollection (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2013‎ (UTC)

You can report puppets yourself at WP:SSP but I'm pretty sure you're completely wrong. Certainly in The Red Pen's case.  Yintan  14:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok if you're completely sure that was wrong. i am not going to report this. Ventagecollection (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I believe that you've included too many deaths in 2013 for April 4. You've included about 10 whereas for most others there are only one or two, if any. There is a separate section for deaths in 2013, so only include more notable deaths.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.144.82 (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't include them, I reversed your unexplained removal of them.  Yintan  16:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

You have definitely made a mistake, I have never edited anything on Wikipedia. Mostly because I dont know how. Please recheck your records. Apparently someone has made an error or cloned my IP Address..

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.209.37 (talk) 18:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. You probably have a dynamic IP address. Yintan  19:13, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I took a look at this removal.

The thing is, the press makes a point of saying that a significant amount of business into the airport comes from Beirut, even if there are no direct flights there (whatever the figure is, the press thinks it's significant). The importance of an aspect is partly based on how much secondary sources talk about it. Even though one can say there are other cities where connecting passengers may go, the press emphasized Beirut, so therefore information about passengers going to and from Beirut belongs in the article. The question is: Where is the best place? I believed that the best place was in the destination list. Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh... I think what contributed to the deletion was that I had forgotten to put in the word "daily" - 40 or 50 people per day come from Beirut. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Yep, that's it. :)  Yintan  20:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Gotcha :) WhisperToMe (talk) 20:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Although I must admit, if I had checked the text better... I made some poor decisions that day.  Yintan  20:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, we're all human. We all make mistakes from time to time. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yintan, You removed a piece of content we just submitted to wikipedia for reasons unknown? The places just listed are renound in Ringstead and are a large part of ringstead village life and cover 2-5ths of the grounds of ringstead, what improvements could you recommend so that we can update the Ringstead Page. Ringstead PC info@firemountainbusiness.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.4.161 (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your comments were biased and introduced commercial links[6]. Please check out WP:NPOV and WP:EL. Thanks.  Yintan  11:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok so the few lines above about the working mens club are not commercial then??... and the village club? and even the sports teams? Im sorry but I cant see how this would be classed as biased as I have no attachment to the links i suggessted, I live in ringstead and it seamed silly to me that the content I supplied was not included. Are you a Ringstead Resident? If thats that then thats ok but I strongly feel that the information provided gave a bigger insight to ringstead, sheading light on a very large boating community that thrives within Ringstead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.4.161 (talk) 11:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Where I live is irrelevant, you simply have to follow the guidelines I mentioned in my previous answer if you want to add information to articles. That's all there is to it.  Yintan  12:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm Pirai from chennai, recently i watched the film in theatre and i've submitted my view on this page.

A lot of good audiences checking this page and reading the reviews frequently, i want to say the original review. Can you please provide the source says postive review of this film. Please dont cheat the readers as of now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.203.175.175 (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Pirai. I'm afraid your personal view on the film[7] is not good enough for Wikipedia. Your review has to be sourced and neutral. There's more information on this at WP:SOURCE. Cheers,  Yintan  12:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

You keep removing my Michael Kirby edits on the street painting page. This is a valid edit. He is a street painter. His website can be found here with more information. http://www.michaelwkirby.com/ Please stop removing my edits to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rflipton (talk • contribs) 13:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

As other editors have already pointed out to you, mr. Kirby is 'not notable'. Please read WP:BIO. Thanks,  Yintan  13:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Who made you the judge of that? There are plenty of pages with incorrect information. Mr. Kirby happens to be a very notable artist with tons of experience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rflipton (talk • contribs) 13:09, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

If you're convinced he passes the WP:BIO requirements (because that's the judge) then I suggest you start an article about him.  Yintan  13:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

There is a Wikipedia page about him -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Kirby_(artist) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rflipton (talk • contribs) 13:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Then why don't you just link to that, instead of adding external spam links to other articles?  Yintan  13:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I thought I did — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rflipton (talk • contribs) 13:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Nope[8].  Yintan  13:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

HI - I've only edited one thing before - I work for the London Borough of Sutton and was asked by someone to check on accuracy of entries. I appreciate that naming London Borough of Sutton with phone number is not considered appropriate so thanks for pointing out. I am putting in opening hours of the historic houses which I hope is acceptable or would it be better to attach a URL or is that allowed? cheers, Kath Shawcross, Borough Archivist & Local Studies Manager, LB Sutton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.137.190 (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kath. Adding the URL of an official Borough of Sutton site (if there is such a thing) is fine, adding other links could be a problem, depending on their content. More info about that is available at WP:EL.  Yintan  13:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Yintan, thank you for your message. I thought the Wiki liked to publish facts, clearly that is not the case in this instance.

That said, I'll not bother contributing further. I'm guessing you already heard this so many times now, that is why you are so hot on the edit button. When sufficient people cry rape - that is a weight of evidence by which rational people can be confident that something isn't what it appears.

Sleep well and have nice dreams. Just never forget, next time you spot a Big Issue seller, he or she is really a slave. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.148.241 (talk) 15:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

To publish facts the wiki needs verifyable sources. All you did was add your opinion ("The fat cats at Big Issue are getting rich off the back of a modern day slave trade"). Get the sources and update the article, fine, but if you claim this sort of thing you have to be able to back it up.  Yintan  15:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

No I didn't, what I wrote is obvious and well known. Like the world is round, not because I've been all the way around, but because sufficient well informed people say it is.

Like I said, there is a weight of evidence and that evidence is being buried every time you delete the evidence.

Jimmy Savile has never been convicted of Child abuse or rape, but sufficient people have come forward and that alone is a weight of evidence that makes it impossible for it to be anything but the truth.

The truth is, Big Issue are taking people's money, these people are being brought to the UK, told they will earn money, they work in the most horrible conditions, they are housed in the type of conditions that are completely unacceptable to the average UK person, the benefits they claim are taken from them and they are worse off than people working in the sweat houses in 3rd world countries. This in a country where we have a minimum wage. It's very very obvious what is happening.

Prove that is not the case? You can't anymore than you can prove the world is flat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.148.241 (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Fine, if it's "obvious and well known", and if "well informed people" say you're right, then it shouldn't be a problem to add sources to your statement[9], as required by WP:VERIFY. You might also want to read WP:NPOV as statements like "They make me sick" aren't appreciated either. Regards,  Yintan  16:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Yintan, thanks. Have a nice life. I'll not bother you further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.148.241 (talk) 16:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

The correction you made was pretty quick and I must say I'm impressed! I thought for sure it would last for a few minutes and to be honest I've simply been watching nothing but the show Steins;Gate for the past few days and figured any fan who came across it would get a kick out of the edit. Also, I'm not mad since someone would have changed it back eventually anyways but just wanted to let you know that the show/anime Steins;Gate where I got it from is amazing and although I have a few more episodes to go extremely recommend it to you and anyone else reading this comment. Oh and also, for anyone actually interested in purchasing an IBM 5100, take about 10 seconds of thought find something more entertaining worth spending the money. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.150.136.141 (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

You issued me with a warning for deleting all of the content from Timtrent's page. I believed this was my own page at the time and this was a pure accident. Therfore, the level 2 warning isn't necessary. I apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Dale Bowes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daleb1995 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

The Timtrent page you deleted has been restored, so no problems there. Cheers,  Yintan  21:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan,

I added movies that Nelson Pereira dos Santos directed, there were very few on the original page and I was also adding official trailers. Why you don't think it is constructive?

Camila — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camilarc (talk • contribs) 21:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Camila. I have no idea what went wrong there. I have restored your work. Sorry for the confusion.  Yintan  21:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Great thank you! I will keep adding the trailers (official) to the titles. Camilarc (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey Yintan, just letting you know that what is going on with this page is that it is being forked. It is not being vandalised or uncontructively edited. Sex 3.0 the social / sexual movement and Sex 3.0 the book are not the same thing (although one did insipre the other).

Sex 3.0 as a movement is an open source sexual revoluitionary movement.

Sex 3.0 the book is just that, it is a book. One can participate in the Sex 3.0 movement without even reading the book if you want. The purpose of the wiki page is to provide resources in order to do that.

Thanks for understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pizza Lord (talk • contribs) 21:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for that.  Yintan  21:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

• • Just following up: I deleted the article on the movement as G11, and listed the book at AfD. DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

And that's fine with me too :)  Yintan  07:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yintan,

I have a question to you. We have a problem with this file

File:New Democratic Spirit logo.svg,

We have tried to do something for removing it from wikipedia because this file should not exist because it uses the logo of New Democratic Spirit Party to offend them (the meaning of the words written in this picture are: New spirit of hanky-panky). As you may understand the one that did this thing has done something illegal because he hasn't respect the rights of the author.

The real information about New Democratic Spirit Party (in albanian it is Fryma e Re Demokratike (FRD)) you may find in this two pages: www.frd.al https://www.facebook.com/FRDemokratike (the profile picture is the real logo)

With respect, Roxhensa, a member of New Democratic Spirit Party — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.71.220 (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

-I just wanted to thank you for understanding our problem. Cheers, Roxhensa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.71.220 (talk) 08:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Roxhensa. As you may have seen I've already reverted the vandalized image. The proper (blue) logo should show up now. Regards,  Yintan  08:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yinta. I edited some texts in Tamil language with citation. Can you please tell me what wrong in that? --Inbamkumar86 (talk) 12:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rajkumar. I reverted your edit because the info you added was already in the article and because you added two links to a language course in Toronto. Regards,  Yintan  12:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The "constructiveness" of the edit was that it appears needlessly confusing who is mother to whom.

Maroza is mentioned twice, first as an afterthought in the introductory sentence, then mentioned again in the sentence where Theodora is called a grandmother.

My edit makes it clear that Theodora is the mother of Maroza. Then the relationship between Maroza and the various popes is made as direct and clear as possible. 90.229.34.175 (talk) 12:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I've done some work on the article now, including your changes and also some minor copy editing. Confusing family, I must say :-)  Yintan  13:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I'm curious why you reverted my vandalism revert in the above article? Regards Denisarona (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I noticed it too. Your Twinkle and my Huggle (now that sounds weird) appear to have battled eachother. I've already reverted back to an earlier, clean version of the article by hand.  Yintan  13:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

You're beginning to sound romantic!!! Cheers - all ok now. Denisarona (talk) 13:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Yintan,

I believe you perhaps unwarrentedly removed fully-factual information from the 'Reasons' section of the 'Artifiial Cranial Deformations' ([[10]]). It is difficult to give citations for an absence of information; please reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.224.150 (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry but you added an unsourced rumour about round-headed visitors from other planets. That's far from "fully factual".  Yintan  15:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

.....granted. But the rest, dear Yintan, the rest! And seeing as i added it to a sentence that itself had a superscripted "citation needed", perhaps this new sentence is being discriminated against for its newness...?

Nothing to do with "newness". It's bad enough we've got unsourced material in the wiki, there's really no need to add more. Especially if it's extremely far fetched, bordering on the totally unbelievable. Call me a skeptic :)  Yintan  15:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, wrong choice of words. But I thought I would let you know, I wouldn't know if read the new message at the time your talk page was edited by the bot. Seqqis (talk) 15:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I saw you've edited quite a few Talkpages by now, adding the same (in my humble opinion totally pointless) message. You might want to reconsider.  Yintan  15:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

hay this all new to me can you xplain to me wat is going on because i have no idea --152.26.35.100 (talk) 15:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)♥

If you're referring to the warning on your Talkpage, that's because somebody with the same IP address as you vandalized[11] the Richard Nixon article.  Yintan  15:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan. The additions I had made to the Matthew Cox page are accurate and factual. Please put them back and I'll add some source quotations. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.33.35.118 (talk) 16:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm not putting them back without verifyable sources. If you want to add it, add it with sources in one go. Cheers,  Yintan  16:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

My mistake, I grabbed too much on the manual revert. Deadbeef 16:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

That's okay, thanks for the vandal watch, anyway :)  Yintan  16:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you felt the need to delete my edits to Rob Hubbards's Wikipedia entry. It was all perfectly valid information pertaining to Hubbard and his work. Your reason being - "because it didn’t appear constructive to me." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.230.20.86 (talk) 17:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

To be quite frank, I'm not sure either. I remember seeing your edits and finding them fine. I'm not sure how they got reverted and I left a message for the software team [12]. I've restored your work. Sorry.  Yintan  18:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Helo Yintan,

I know the Karen leaders and the French fighters there and it should be updated. You forgot some names and those of people killed in Kotulay. It has to be on the page. It is an accurate update because I know very well someone who was there a month ago. The KNDO is still active, alongside the KNLA. This has to be updated too.

Do what you want, but reversing those edits does not do justice to the French people who died there and are still helping.

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.207.188.53 (talk) 19:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Please add sources to your edits, especially if you're mentioning (the numbers of) casualties. My edit has nothing to do with justice or injustice but everything with WP:VERIFY. Regards,  Yintan  19:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I recently removed the "Roosevelt Field Mall incident" section from Scooter Braun's page because the charges were dropped and his record was cleared. Please remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.7.28.198 (talk) 22:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

No, why? It's well sourced and the section itself also explains that the case has been settled.  Yintan  22:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For beating me in Raanjhanaa (recently) and also in many other cases. Anyway, keep up the good work. Tolly4bolly 08:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!  Yintan  08:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok thats fair enough, so your not going to comment on the fact the other information on the page could be viewed as commercial points of interest? Also the person that just made a comment above "Pirai from chennai" you stated his sources have to be "sourced and neutral" there is no such thing, every single person in the world who writes a review on something be it a film or a kettle is automatically going to have their own opinions this is part of what makes us human, and if every review had to be sourced then there would be no such things as reviews as there would be nothing to source from, also what also makes a review is the point of view of ther reviewer so if it has to be sourced this isnt going to be a unique point of view from the reviewer but a derivative from someone elses point of view which too would also have to be sourced? And im sorry but where you live is relevent because if you lived in ringstead you would see why I tried to include the content i did, You not knowing the area makes it more prominent that you should not be administrating a page of which the content you have no idea what its about. Just a few things to consider. This will be my last post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.4.161 (talk) 12:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.  Yintan  12:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan, I modified that page because it was wrong (compare Investopedia or any other source about finance). If you trust Investopedia, "Dirty price" says "[...] is the price an investor will pay to acquire the bond." Please revert the page back to my modification. Thanks, Abramo

I'm pretty sure you're mistaken, Abramo. Check out [13] and [14]. Regards,  Yintan  09:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I have already controlled those pages. 1) I those pages there is no trace of the price you have to pay to bond holder. It is about the price quotes in the market. It can happen that you buy a bond for 100 $ but you have to pay 101 $ for it (that's exactly the difference between clean and dirty...). If I am wrong, please copy/paste here the sentence in those page that contradicts me. 2) I hope you can agree with me that if I am trying to correct Wikipedia I cannot trust Wikipedia itself :) ! Please, link me another source. Regards, Abramo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.233.155.161 (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you take this to the article's Talkpage and discuss it there. If you are convinced there is such a huge mistake in the article (I'm not), then you better sort it out there.  Yintan  10:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Yintan, I gave you motivations, sources. I give you here one more: check "clean price" and "dirty price" in the Glossary of Eurex webpage [15]. You gave me nothing back. Not a source, not an answer to my questions. I can't see any reason why my modification is blocked or why I have to discuss it on "Bond (finance)" discuss page. If you have any argument, I'll be happy to discuss. But at now there is no discussion at all to post on that page. Regards, Abramo 12:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.233.155.161 (talk)

Hi Yintan, I found out the problem. Some months ago the page was correct [16] but an idiot read the page and switched "dirty <-> clean". A "Yes, you were right!" would be appreciated :-) Thanks anyway for your work, Abramo 14:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.233.155.161 (talk)

Hey, if you're right, you're right. Glad you got it sorted.  Yintan  14:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - 130.238.141.152 (talk) 12:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I have dude, but you're not answering. So cut the nonsense, okay?  Yintan  12:24, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Its good that you have begun talking. 130.238.141.152 (talk) 12:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I already asked you this 3 hours ago[17]. You're the one who never answered the question. But anyway, I still think the photo is completely misplaced there but I'm not interested in starting a war about it. I'm sure another editor will remove it again, because the connection you're making between Chili and Palingenesis is rather far-fetched.  Yintan  12:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Explain you point of view in the talk page and stop edit warriyng and doint loose acusations of vandalism you have failed to provide proof of. Wikipedia is not a battlefield (WP:BATTLE). −130.238.141.152 (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm not editwarring and if you've got something to say I think it's best you do that at the ANI report you filed.  Yintan  16:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hey, Yintan, about this: as I said at the ANI thread, I don't think this falls under the category of vandalism, and so you were technically edit-warring, though I know you believed you were operating on the assumption of the revert-vandalism exception. Vandalism is a label that needs to be applied pretty carefully, after all. Anyway, I'd say to just hold off on reverting that article any more, since it's not really vandalism. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I read your view, thanks, and I have no problems with it at all. Also, I haven't touched the article since this fun started. I'm not that interested in Palingenesis, so no worries about me reverting again. Cheers,  Yintan  17:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, the fact that you stopped relatively quickly (well, quicker than the IP, at least) plus your assumption of the vandalism exception does a lot to mitigate it in my book. Like I say, just be a little more careful in what you call vandalism and you're perfectly fine. The IP's started a discussion on the talk page rather than reverting, which is a good sign on their end, so things are looking up. Happy editing! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

There is a discussion at AN/I with which you may have been involved. The IP forgot to tell you of this, so I will instead. TCN7JM 12:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

It gets better all the time. Thanks.  Yintan  12:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

After you (very reasonably) gave a "last and final warning" to one or more kids here, the nitwit(s) continued with infantile edits and you continued giving them warnings. This is bizarre. It's not obvious that you asked for administrative intervention. Next time, please do so. (This time, however, I've provided a long and leisurely vacation for him/them and chums.) -- Hoary (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

That is weird. It appears Huggle just started recounting warnings. I never ask for intervention because after 4 warnings the vandal gets automatically reported by Huggle at WP:AIV and that's the end of that. Usually, anyway. I don't know what happened there, I never go 1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4. Okay, I'm dumping Huggle, I've had too many strange things happening with it recently. This is the final straw. But thanks for the message! And let's hope they'll enjoy their vacation :)  Yintan  13:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Just to mark the occassion. Saving this message is my 22.222nd edit. Ouch.  Yintan  07:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Congrats! Keep it up. Faizan -Let's talk! 10:51, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back. I thought we had lost a valuable contributor. Arctic Kangaroo 10:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.  Yintan  10:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Awarded to you in recognition of your services against vandalism. Welcome back, now I will see Yintan working against those vandalizing morons again! Love you! Faizan -Let's talk! 10:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

And thank you too.  Yintan  10:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

And I have copied your message on talk,  ! Did I do right? Faizan -Let's talk! 10:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

I couldn't have put it better myself ;-)  Yintan  10:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan

If 'play network' were allowed a link on the page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retail_Background_Music#Effectiveness) then surely we are. I have deleted the play network link. I don't understand however, why you (maybe it wasn't you???) removed the paragraph about the PRS though. That was just plain information, there were no links there apart from to other wiki articles.

Regards,

Will — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.184.49 (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Will. Yes, that was me. I removed your link because in my opinion it didn't belong in the article. See WP:EL. Your removal of the Play Network link is fine with me. Your text is back, too.  Yintan  15:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Yintan! How do I detect vandalism to my comments and find out who done it? Thanks! Please reply back soon. --68.229.239.155 (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC) -Bil

Clicking the 'View history' tab of the page in question should give you an answer.  Yintan  08:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Regarding the Karambit page, I did added something without adding any direct source/link, but I did add the page Pasukan Gerakan Khas since the organization itself has 2 distinct subcomponent, one of which uses the Karambit as its logo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Crest_of_the_69_Komando.png

Since I'm not that proficient in editing wikipedia, I hope the link above would count as a source. It was taken from the page Pasukan Gerakan Khas.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.51.125.187 (talk) 22:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

I fixed the text for you. Cheers,  Yintan  07:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Looks like you get two of these today...

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You always beat me at catching those vandals, I owe it to you. Great work, friend. P.S. – checked out your music, good stuff! — MusikAnimal talk 22:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the star and the musical compliment. They're both much appreciated. Now buy my album and make me rich :)  Yintan  07:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I you go to Melissa Satta's page you can see that what I wrote are facts. Use Google. U guys are so lazy. Look to see if it is the truth before removing it next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.126.46.146 (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but that's not how it works. Your claims need to have references in the article, especially if your making statements about personal issues like divorces and such. Check out WP:VERIFY. I saw you put the unsourced info back in the article again, I'm going to remove it again.  Yintan  11:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Yintan, I had not added that link but I think it's a useful resource and it links to the flag in different file format readily available for use. I think it helps the public to use the files for use in digital and print medium. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fursid (talk • contribs) 11:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Fursid. As far as I can see you did add that link but anyway, links to editors' personal blogs are usually unwanted. There's more about that at WP:EL. Suggestion: Why don't you upload your version of the flag to the wiki, so that it can be used in the article?  Yintan  11:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Yintan, There were a lot of mistakes in list of prime ministers of Iran in English wikipedia. I want to fix them as I do in Persian Wikipedia. Samad Khan Momtaz os-Saltaneh was never prime minister of Iran. 109.162.221.182 (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I think it's better you discuss this on the article's Talkpage first. A lot of people appear to disagree with you. Regards,  Yintan  12:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

You can visit this page to find the correct list of Prime ministers of Iran. (http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Iran.htm) 109.162.221.182 (talk) 12:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, no. I'm not interested in editing that article, you are. You better talk to the editors there. Regards,  Yintan  12:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan,

Thanks for your message. I have removed the section entitled 'Football Officials' since that was outdated information about the club. After 2009 the club escaped from relegation and in 2010, a new board was elected at the end of the year, in which Fluminense also managed to secure the Campeonato Brasileiro Serie A title. Since then, the team has been a constant contender of cups and championships it has played in, while the club as a whole has enjoyed drastic developments in infra-structural, financial and HR areas. For such, I believe the 'Football Officials' section in the wiki page only served as misinformation that could probably lead readers to believe that the 2009 'turmoil' (as described) had any serious or lasting impacts on the institution or on the football played.

I hope you can understand this.

Furthermore, I would like to inform you as well that the 'Campeonato Brasileiro Serie A' title count which shows up in that 'summary' of the club (when you google the word 'fluminense' but don't enter any links and the summary of the club shows on the right side of the Google Search page) is outdated. There it shows '1984, 2010, 2012', when it should really be '1970, 1984, 2010, 2012'. This information is official and has even been updated on the main wiki page of Fluminense F.C. but it hasn't been altered in the 'summary' page. Is there anything that can be done to fix that?

I appreciate your consideration and look forward to hearing from you.

Best Regards,

Caio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.161.119 (talk) 12:40, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

By the looks of it you're well on the way already :) Happy editing!  Yintan  13:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan,

I am working on the official history of the Brasenose College Boat Club. In the course of checking BNC's wikipedia entry, I noticed the mention of John Cherry.

I suspect Cherry's wikipedia entry was made by an enthusiastic undergraduate member of the Boat Club. But it is in fact wrong, as he was never known as John Cherry when a rower, but was known at Brasenose and at Leander as Con Cherry.

To check my suspicions were correct, I asked the BNC assistant archivist to recover the obituary from the 1943 college magazine. She provided this, as well as an extract of all college entires for him. These all show him as Con Cherry. Because of these facts, I thought it appropriate to change his name on the Brasenose College page to Con Cherry.

You will find I have also made extensive updates to the wikipedia page for Cherry.

I am happy to provide you the reference material for Cherry, which I received from BNC tonight. I have a soft copy of a photograph of him, but am unsure how to add the photo to his entry.

Yours,

William — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.26.172 (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi William. Point is, in all references and obituaries listed in the article he's called John Cherry. I suggest we go for a compromise and call him John (Con) Cherry in the Brasenose article, just like he's called in his own article. I'll also make a redirect for Con Cherry. Regards,  Yintan  13:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Almost forgot. The photograph. I think you'll find all you need to know at WP:IUP.  Yintan  13:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good.

William — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.26.172 (talk) 14:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I was about to put in the citation! Don't tell me I have to rewrite? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.248.159.161 (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Looks like it. I'm not going to revert your unsourced sex tape story into the article. So if you have a proper source (see WP:VERIFY) then add it to the article together with the text.  Yintan  20:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan

Following conversation with Demiurge1000 where we were asked to add sourced and remove marketing words from our information. We have done this and the information has still been revert back. How can i made changes to the page without it being reverted. For example there is a new headteacher but this keeps changing back to the old one.

Please can you advise.

Kind regards Young331

Hi, Following your message regarding difference between revisions, I would like to clarify that these changes made were intentional. The Academies have recently undergone huge changes within their structure and are now under new leadership, hence the need for change to the information on the Wikipedia page. I am unaware of who created the initial material, and although backed by many citations, this material is now dated and in need of amending. The individuals who are listed and mentioned in the 'Basildon Academies' Wikipedia page are no longer members of staff at the school, thus providing a need for the information to be updated accordingly. It would be much appreciated if you would be able to revert your decision to undo the material posted by myself -user Young331. Many ThanksYoung331 (talk) 15:25, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

I can't revert my edit, because the material you added included things like: "It offers a unique learning structure" "committed to ensuring all students have access to a range of opportunities and experiences which raise their aspirations and broaden their horizons, developing ambitious global citizens" "inspire all students, ensuring they leave with the skills, qualifications and confidence to succeed in the 21st Century, whatever their chosen pathway" "Alongside a rich and varied curriculum, which is continually being developed and expanded to meet changing demands and expectations" "global internet phenomenon" "unique experiences" "developing key leadership skills for all students, invaluable for their future education and working life" "dedicated to raising results and attainment at all levels" "strengthen and accelerate the rate of change" "welcoming and vibrant environment" ... all of it completely unsourced. This is not encyclopedic material; this is marketing material. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Young331 (talk • contribs)

It's quite simple, Young331. Editor Demiurge1000 is right. The material you added is promotional and unsourced. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFY, that'll explain a lot, I think. Regards,  Yintan  17:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

...for reverting my talk page. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 20:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure.  Yintan  20:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Sh*t thought i was on the sandbox section, really sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.187 (talk) 20:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

The sandbox that somehow kept generating different articles so you had something fresh to vandalize? Four times in a row? Okayyyy....  Yintan  21:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me? I'm new to the site. I thought the sandbox was just a complete replica of the actual wiki site. I would thank you for keeping wiki clean but your ignorance towards beginners is frankly sickening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.187 (talk) 21:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hm, judging by the stuff you added to these articles I didn't think you'd be so easily sickened. And those warnings that kept appearing on your Talkpage, they didn't ring a bell? I'm not saying you're lying, I'm just very surprised. But anyway, no harm done.  Yintan  21:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok apologies Chief Constable Yintan of the wiki police. Forgive and forget — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.187 (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry if I sounded a bit too sarcastic to your liking. And thanks for my new rank. Does it come with a raise? Cheers,  Yintan  21:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Haha no problem, whatever you like. Keep up the good work fella.≈

Please stop reverting my edits. The information I entered is correct. 71.72.24.51 (talk) 02:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Let's see... I reverted you once[18], when you added five buildings and a hundred million species to the Museum's collection without any source to back this up. I think you'll find that's not unreasonable. Please check out WP:VERIFY.  Yintan  21:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I have the references, I just don't know how to add them to the article. 71.72.24.51 (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:Citing sources. Drmies (talk) 02:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Could you please look at the article now, and tell me what you think. I included the necessary references, and I reverted the line about it being one of the largest natural history museums in the world. 71.72.24.51 (talk) 03:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

I saw on Drmies' talkpage that the problem has already been explained to you. Regards,  Yintan  08:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

First of all, "Its built-in radiant heating system which worked." is a fragment and therefore grammatically incorrect. Second of all, it is a false statement. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candlestick_Park#Reputation for the following excerpt:

The stadium also had the reputation as the coldest park in the Major League Baseball. It was initially built with a radiant heating system of hot water pipes under the Lower Box seats in a space between the concrete and the ground. However, the pipes were not embedded in the concrete, and did not produce enough heat to offset the cold air.

Please reconsider using my edit, perhaps as parenthetical: "(Its built-in radiant heating system never worked properly.)" Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.217.37 (talk) 07:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. You are completely correct, I made a mistake. I've added the 'never' to the sentence. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers,  Yintan  08:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

i was just embellishing upon my father's birthdate and correcting his deathdate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.176.24 (talk) 09:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

You added "<ref><ref><ref><ref><ref></ref></ref></ref></ref>" to the info box, which broke it completely. That's why I reverted your edit and assumed it was a test. Please use the 'Show preview' button to check if your edits are correct before saving them. Thanks,  Yintan  09:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

sorry-i do not know how to use a computer well. i was just trying to be helpful! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.176.24 (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

That's okay. If you need help with adding the dates, just give me a shout.  Yintan  09:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Did you read the citation that I provided? My change is not vandalism. I provided reputable sourcing. User:174.44.110.154

Yes, I read it. I wonder if you did. It clearly states that 'Albertus Alauda' is not the official name of the star. But I'm sure you'll soon have astronomers telling you that too.  Yintan  16:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

And there we go[19].  Yintan  12:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

hi, i just wanted to post this for 24 hours to celebrate my mums 60th birthday. can you leave for this long please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.39.2 (talk) 11:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

With all due respect to your mum, but being a "mother of 4" is not enough of an achievement to be included in Wikipedia. And if I don't remove it, someone else surely will. It's not going to work. Sorry. But congratulations :)  Yintan  12:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Yintan, I hold a Ph.D. in English Medieval History from the University of Toronto. I don't say that to brag but the nature of your objection to the edit I made this morning to the articles on Joan Beaufort and Katherine Swynford suggests I need to be able to back up what I said in both passages.

The historical fact is that a medieval English king did not enjoy the authority to alter an existing Act of Parliament by himself. Any alteration had to be approved by Parliament. Otherwise the alteration lasted only for the lifetime of the king who made it. Since Henry IV never sought Parliamentary approval for the words he added to the original Act legitimizing the Beauforts, the force of those words ended upon Henry's death in 1413.

For the record, the words he added were "excepto dignitati regali," which translate directly to "the royal dignity excepted," meaning the Beauforts could inherit any lands or titles bestowed on them, but could not inherit the Crown. As king, Henry must have known that the exception would only last until his death, and we don't know exactly why he didn't seek Parliamentary approval for the change he made. Henry had, of course, deposed his predecessor Richard II in 1399, and his hold on the throne was tenuous throughout his reign. Quite possibly (though again we lack certain proof here), he wanted to limit the number of possible claimants to the throne to whatever extent he could---after all, he had sacked Richard II and if one member of the royal house could do that to one king, somebody else might do it to him as well. It's also quite possible that since he owed his crown to Parliamentary recognition as king, and since Parliament had approved the Beauforts' legitimation, Henry didn't want to outrage opinion in Parliament by asking them to amend the legitimation. So he did it on his own to ensure that there would be no claims to the throne from the Beauforts, at least during his reign. (Since his son Henry V was recognized by Parliament as his heir in 1399, Henry V succeeded to the throne in an entirely legal/constitutional manner; thus his title to the throne was more secure than was Henry IV's, and Henry V would not have to be as concerned about counter-claimants as his father had been.)

So I don't understand your assertion that my addition to these articles didn't strike you as "constructive." In fact the point is a very important one in the history of England during the latter part of the Wars of the Roses. Henry Tudor's leadership of the Lancastrian faction after 1471 rested in large measure on his descent from the Beauforts. If they had been barred from the throne by the change Henry IV made to the Act of Parliament, Henry (later King Henry VII) couldn't have assumed a position of leadership for the Lancastrians.

74.190.196.76 (talk) 11:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your reply. The problems I had with your edit were simple. I don't doubt your knowledge or expertise, but you have to follow the editing guidelines. Your additions were unsourced, slightly biased ("Some unreliable authorities claim..."), and bordered on original research (more about these guidelines at WP:VERIFY, WP:NPOV and WP:OR, respectively). If there aren't any sources for what you're saying, then it's better to discuss your views first on the article's Talkpage, or at the very least add a {{fact}} tag to them. If you don't, there's a fair chance that another editor will remove them again. That's all, really. Regards,  Yintan  12:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

hello Yintan, thanks for reverting my page but it was me who cleared my sandbox without logging in. Sorry for creating so much trouble and wasting your time. Idiosyncratic philosopher (talk) 11:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

No sweat :)  Yintan  12:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yintan,

I am trying to teach english speaking people how to correctly pronounce Thai place names in the Thai language using accurate phonetics. Bangkok is pronounced bang by foreigners even though it should be pronounced bung or bahng.

I am making a sincere effort — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.165.87.115 (talk) 23:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Don't get me wrong, I don't doubt your sincerity. But your edit "Bangkok (pronounced baang gaawk)" still leaves a lot of room for misunderstanding. Please use IPA[20] for phonetic characters. As in: "Beijing (/beɪˈdʒɪŋ/)". Regards,  Yintan  08:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yintan

Actually I have researched and know very well about 3 different sets of phonetics. These sets come from people who are world leaders in transcribing Thai into English. The pronounciation I have offered above is from Benjawan Poomsan Becker and it is spot on. This work has been going on for a long long time and is far superior to the IPA system (which 99% of people are not familiar with anyway) and superior to the RTGS system (outdated but still used unfortunately) because it has tonal marks and uses only English letters.

The pronunciation I offer is a big improvement on what is out there at the moment and it is something that english speakers can follow easily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.165.87.115 (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

That's your opinion. If you think your method should become the new norm for Wikipedia, I suggest you bring it up at WP:MOSIPA.  Yintan  15:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

I noticed you have deleted our exchange on this Talkpage two times already. I very strongly suggest you stop doing that.  Yintan  16:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I am new to this and I feel embarrassed I know so little about about editing wikipedia especially coming up against someone as experienced as yourself. I know that there are many flaws in the official ways to transliterate Thai into English, so much so that almost every foreigner who has set foot in Thailand cannot even pronounce the name of the capital. Unfortunately the wikipedia rules in this instance are too strict and this unfortunate mispronounciation wiil only continue to be propagated because of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.165.87.115 (talk) 17:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry if you find Wikipedia's rules too strict, but that's what the community here has decided on. Like I said, if you want it changed you can always suggest that (but to be honest, I don't think you stand much of a chance since IPA is an international standard). Regards,  Yintan  17:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for all your work at hunting down all of the vandals! (t) Josve05a (c) 14:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much!  Yintan  14:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Yintan, this information is in Neil Young's new autobigraphy on page 124 and on the first page of Chapter 32. I did not know how to leave a citation for this, but it is true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.223.122 (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Info about adding refs is at WP:REF. Cheers,  Yintan  14:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Russian wiki is a source of information about connection between Olga and her brother, Gen. Gleb Baklanov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.232.10.45 (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Then I suggest you add those Russian refs to the article together with your info. Cheers,  Yintan  18:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, of course — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.232.10.45 (talk) 18:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

my souces are from infamous 2 its the opening movie/cutscene/clip thats all i wanted to let you know. thanks for reading, W1lliam

Hi William. I think we're talking about your addition "before the eents of infamous cole was a colege dropout and got job as a bike courier", right?  Yintan  20:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Here is the source http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/MFT/pdf/mft_samp_questions_music.pdf http://www.ets.org/mft/about/content/music re: Corelli

Hi. I'm sorry but I fail to see how a music exam with 129 multiple choice questions is a source. Maybe we're misunderstanding eachother. Have you read WP:SOURCE? Regards,  Yintan  21:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I edited the following gramatically ambiguous sentence: "the white authorities conspire to frame him with unlawful sexual relations with Eleanor and taking away his title," to " the white authorities conspire to frame him with unlawful sexual relations with Eleanor 'and thereby take away his title" which resolves the ambiguity by establishing clear causality between the authorities conspiring to frame him and what the authorities wish to gain from doing so: the loss of his title. The edit was rejected as unconstructive, which it is not, as it is grammatically clearer and therefore better than the original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.217.127 (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Don't want to nitpick but you changed "taking away his title" into "and therby takie away his title"[21].  Yintan  20:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Exactly right, which solves a problem I hate to say you seem not to be grasping. The structure of the sentence is such that "conspire" is the main verb which then takes both "to frame" and "taking away his title" as direct objects ie. they are not explicitly causally linked. This means that what the sentence says grammatically, rather than intuitively, is that they conspire to frame him and conspire to taking away his title as two distinct and not necessarily linked events. This creates a problem for two reasons: first, gerunds, such as taking, should not be preceded by to (which is what is happening grammatically in this sentence). Secondly, the causality of the framing and the loss of the title is ambiguous because it is only implied. The "thereby" and "take" solve the ambiguity by limiting the verb conspire to framing and introducing causality explicitly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.217.127 (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Please look again at the quote in my previous answer. This is not about grammar, it's about spelling.  Yintan  21:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I just noticed the "i" in "takie." I apologize for the typo, I caught it and changed it, but that must have been right before or as you were reverting the page. The larger grammatical edit, however, is still correct and the reversion remains ambiguous.

And the missing "e" in "therby". You added two words to the article, and misspelled them both. That's why I reverted, nothing more.  Yintan  21:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Again, I apologize for the typos. Although I caught both of those typos, and tried to edit them out, your reversion overrode my edits. In terms of the generally excellent maintenance by Wikipedia moderators/monitor, I find it a bit disheartening that you are completely ignoring the larger issue. If I edit the sentence without the typos, will you simply revert it back again or do you accept the grammatical validity of the intended edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.217.127 (talk) 21:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

With all due respect, "the larger issue" isn't an issue. I already told you two answers ago this is not about grammar, it's about spelling. If you want to change the grammatical structure of the sentence, go ahead, why would I object to that?  Yintan  21:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

With all due respect, your manner is aggressive and combative, which suggests someone more interested in some form of misguided self-aggrandizement than with a commitment to real quality. The larger issue is in fact an issue, which, I suspect, you simply lacked the grammatical understanding to appreciate. I have edited the page to reflect the better form sans typos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.217.127 (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Suspect all you like. You are so missing the point it's almost painfull to see.  Yintan  21:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Yintan,

The today Metamorphosis page was originally named METAMORPHOSE - METAMORPHOSIS Mask Sound & Dance Theatre or METAMORPHOSE - Mask Sound & Dance Theatre.

It was changed and changed and by the way gone. Can you please help to reinstall the page?

Thanks a lot! User:Mindfuldorje

Give me a minute, I'll transfer it to your sandbox.  Yintan  22:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I am not vandalizing wiki, I am editing wiki so that an actual person shows up over a fictional one, please use the subtext Scott Summers (fictional character) to redirect to Cyclops — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgf96 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

• Well, what you should do is make an article with the title "Scott Summers (author)" instead of replacing another article's content. You'll need sources to make the subject notable, though, so if you make an article, you'll want to find secondary, reliable sources that show the notability of the subject. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Nothing to add to that. Cheers,  Yintan  22:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Why did you undo my edit? Is the edit I made false? Is the two My Little Pony Friendship is Magic IDW comics books series for all ages like the cartoon? Are those two My Little Pony Friendship is Magic IDW comics books series appropriate for children like the cartoon?184.20.209.241 (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I saw you've already been answered on Masem's Talkpage.  Yintan  09:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I have put the external link that is related to this topic. So as per me it's appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.130.224 (talk) 11:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan,

I just cited some references about the historical context of the house at 4 Perry Street in Brookline, Massachusetts, which you deleted. Did I do something wrong?

Thank you and regards, Steve Seltzer User:75.150.92.233

Hi Steve. Yes, your edits are breaking the page, that's why I reverted them. Please use the 'Show preview' button before clicking 'Save', just to be on the safe side. Furthermore, external links should go in an External Links section at the bottom of the page. If you need any help, let me know. Cheers,  Yintan  13:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

How do I detect vandalism to an article? Thanks! -Bil--68.229.239.155 (talk) 00:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Bill. WP:HTSV is a good place to start. Cheers,  Yintan  09:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Yintan! I found out what the View History button does. I guess you can easily see earlier versions of that article! Thanks -Bill --68.229.239.155 (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm

" Iran acknowledged that nearly 300,000 people died in the war "

100 thousand of those 300 thousand were civilians,the military deaths of iran were not higher than 200 thousand, i dont know why wikipedia lets people make false claims about the number of iranian deaths ( pathetic exaggeration of numbers of the death soldiers-militiamens ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.255.8.243 (talk) 14:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm frankly not interested in that discussion. You added unsourced content to the page, claiming there were about a 100.000 less casualties than reported. That's why I reverted. You have to back that up with sources. If you want to discuss it, it's better to do so on the article's Talkpage. Regards,  Yintan  14:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

You deleted the edit about Ronnie Irani subject to a campaign to have him sacked from TalkSport, this is al true and evidence will be provided on request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.34.121 (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry but that's not how it works, providing "evidence on request". Please check out WP:VERIFY. Thanks,  Yintan  15:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok ill send you some evidence now. http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=275472 https://www.facebook.com/groups/64217125610/#!/groups/64217125610/ https://twitter.com/GetIraniOffTS Just some evidence to back up my claim that subject to a campaign to have him removed from TalkSPort... — Preceding unsigned comment added by RIIAFLC (talk • contribs) 16:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't think these are considered to be reliable sources, to be honest.  Yintan  17:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/football-funnies-talksports-ronnie-irani-1858540 heres a story from a newspaper here in the UK pulling him up on one of his many lies, all other sources show there is a campaign to get him off TalkSport! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RIIAFLC (talk • contribs) 17:28, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm getting rid of a bias opinion written on this page where it says that the 'Boy's Choir subtly complement the girl's voices'. This is both incorrect information as they do not sing together and is in favour of the female voices which are not as good as the male voices. Please stop putting the line back, it violates the Wikipedia policy you are trying to instil. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.146.226 (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I reversed because your addition "the girl's choir does an awfully good job of complementing the talent of the boy's choir" was even more biased. And then I went to the article and removed all the biased content that had accumulated there. Cheers,  Yintan  16:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Creo que en el tema de Narconon solamente se habla mal de el y las opiniones de unos cuantos, no basadas en datos concretos o probados, sino solamente en opiniones de alguien. Si realmente wikipedia quisiera saber de narconon no deberia limitarse a poner todo lo malo que haya en la web acerca de narconon. Lo primero es "narconon es cienciologia", cuando narconon es un programa secular, no religioso...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.86.132.185 (talk) 17:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC) juan luis dominguez

I don't speak Spanish, my friend. This is the English wikipedia.  Yintan  17:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan , the Germanic warfare has some biased and incorrect opinions that I corrected , feel free to discuss, I haven't reverted your edits but I suggest you to do so in order to not share uncongruent and wrong informations Thank you. P.Henrich Jochen (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC) P.Henrich Jochen

Hi. You added new and unsourced information, and some of it contradicts what the article says. Please add reliable sources to your claims (see WP:SOURCE) when you make edits like that. That's why I reverted your edit: wiki policy. You might want to discuss your views on the article's Talkpage too. Or first. I'm not interested in Germanic warfare as such, I'm just trying to keep the wiki clean. Regards,  Yintan  17:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

By the way, I just noticed that the article used to be a redirect to a larger article that included Germanic warfare. I've restored the redirect, so your editing will take place at the original location.  Yintan  18:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Why did you block me? What did I do? I just signed a post I made on a user's talk page that I forgot to sign, nothing major. 86.159.243.137 (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Adding "What are you doing, you prick?" is your way of signing, is it?  Yintan  20:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks, Yintan, for keeping an eye out for vandalism on my personal pages. Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Neat trick. The IP vandal took the article for Strabane. Found/replaced Strabane to Asda, and replaced the real Asda article. Pinethicket (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

That guy needs to get... o, never mind.  Yintan  20:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

I edited the page with a neutral standpoint. All of my editions clearly stated that, for example, 'his critics suggest that etc.' and not suggesting that this view is necessarily accepted by all. I feel that it is wrong to have deleted my editions. Please can you ammend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.208.208 (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I see your point about the "critics suggest" lines but the point is that you provided no sources at all for these statements. Sources are essential, especially when you're quoting others (more about that at WP:SOURCE). If you have sources for these statements, add them to your text and paste it in again. Without sources the chance that another editor will remove the text again is quite high. Does it help if I put the removed text on your Talkpage for you or do you know how to get it out of the article's history? Cheers,  Yintan  21:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

yes it would — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.208.208 (talk) 21:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, just a minute.  Yintan  21:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. He's a bit upset as his article keeps getting deleted, and he thought I wasn't answering him. I quite understand his feelings - it's not nice being told you aren't as important as you thought you were. Peridon (talk) 17:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Yep, life in the wiki is a bitch ;-)  Yintan  17:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Who is the user? 121.7.54.103 (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

It is customary to change the names of foreign Kings and Queens to the equivalent in the article's language. That's why all the Kings of France named 'Louis' are called 'Luis' in the Spanish wikipedia, 'Ludwig' in the German wikipedia, and 'Luigi' in the Italian wikipedia. Therefore, 'Willem-Alexander' should be called 'William-Alexander' in the English wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.190.149 (talk) 09:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I've been looking through the English Wiki's naming conventions at WP:NCROY but can't find anything about that. Could you point me to that particular guideline, please? I'm not saying you're wrong, it's just completely new to me and I'd like to read it. Thanks,  Yintan  09:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

"In deciding whether and how to translate a foreign name into English, follow English-language usage. If there is no established English-language treatment for a name, translate it if this can be done without loss of accuracy and with greater understanding for the English-speaking reader."

The established English-language treatment for Kings of the Netherlands named Willem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_I_of_the_Netherlands)(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_II_of_the_Netherlands) is to anglicise it to 'William.'

Thanks for that, I'll keep it in mind.  Yintan  10:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting my edit Yintan. I dislike TED, and couldn't help taking a shot at them. It's people like you who make Wikipedia a great resource, and I'll try to control myself in the future. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.31.106.34 (talk) 10:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Good idea ;-)  Yintan  10:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I made this page about 5 years ago and now since CELOS has ceased to exist, I am modifying it. The link at the bottom is also not working any more as we gave away the domain name. FYI: http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/news/cusat-merges-celos-international-school-photonics

Okay, I saw the article has just been listed for deletion too.  Yintan  10:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Sir, i am a worshiper of Lord Kalki.. He is the 10th and the last incarnation of Lord MahaVishnu in Hindu Mythology. Lord KALKI is an idol.. which is worshiped by many Indians. He is not a human or any ordinary man, he is the supreme power. I am although recognized with this that there are many other people who introduce their selves as Lord, but they all are false persons. They are robbing people in the costume of God. So, i would kindly request you to remove all the stuff posted about Lord Kalki. Here are some links that will lead you to the real KALKI. The Supreme Power. We have organization which work to spread the name of the Real Kalki.

http:\\www.shrikalkibalvatika.com or http:\\www.shrikalki.com http:\\www.jaikalki.com htpp:\\www.facebook.com\groups\kalkigroup.real http:\\www.youtube.com\merekalki

That may be, but you can't just go around deleting articles that don't fit in your beliefs. Please read WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:NPOV, for example. Regards,  Yintan  13:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, We thank you for your suggestion that our entry titled "human growth" is actually a subset of "human development (biology)" and that we should rather expand the latter entry instead of creating a new entry but, as recognized international experts in the field of "human growth and development", we know that the way in which human development has been portrayed on the current Wikipedia entry is at odds with the science of human growth and, indeed, is misleading. We have created the entry "human growth" because human development is actually a subset of human growth. As evidence to support this statement index medicus/pubmed returns 831,452 articles on "human growth" and only 339,975 articles on "human development". Human growth, rather than human development, is a core science with a clear focus on the growth of the child whilst human development is a broad category encompassing the development not only of the child but also communities and nations in both social and economic contexts. To describe human growth as human development (biology) is inaccurate. We note that the present entry on "human development (biology)" has not been updated in over five years and the information it contains in the light of advances in research in human growth is out of date but the critical point is that the title "human development (biology)" is inappropriate for the information contained therein. We would appreciate it if you would reconsider your rejection of our entry and advance our entry on "human growth".

Professor Michelle Lampl, Emory University, USA; Professor Noel Cameron, Loughborough University, UK.Hgrowth (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Gentlemen, I think it's best if you discuss this at the article's Talkpage(s) and get consensus for your proposal there. I don't really have a horse in this race :-) Kind regards,  Yintan  15:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

You are doing great anti-vandalism work. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Don't make me blush :-)  Yintan  15:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Yintan,

In reviewing the guidelines for external links, I do not understand why the link was removed. It contains a catalog of every death from the opening scenes of Six Feet Under.

Thanks,

Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.65.56.40 (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Because it's not an official 'Six Feet Under' site but a private blog.  Yintan  15:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)