User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive166

Is this person Alex Blackwell (cricketer)?? . Looks very much like this shot of her

Question: In photo #4, what's that thing draped over her shoulder? Pdfpdf (talk) 04:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 4 or 5 Harrias (talk) 10:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 or 4 —Spaceman Spiff
• 7 - Well, she certainly knows how to frown! So that rules out 1, 3, 4, 5 & 6 - leaving 2 & 7, both wearing sunglasses. Hmmm. Actually, I prefer 7. --Pdfpdf (talk) 11:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 - best view of her face Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 - best view of what she looks like. Dincher (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 - best shot of her face.—Sandahl (♀) 03:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 seems to be the most popular so I have uploaded a new edit of that image with shadow/highlight changes applied. Refer to the file history to see the difference. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 is the best shot of her face but 2 is a more interesting photo.--Sarastro1 (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Mathmo ^Talk 11:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 undoubtedly but needs a little crop. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 —Dark 06:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 7 edges it for me - though 4 is just about acceptable. Privatemusings (talk) 04:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 -- Y not? 18:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 Bastique ^demandez 00:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 –MuZemike 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 - She looks like she's constipated in all of the others. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 or 6. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 Abecedare (talk) 06:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 or 5. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 --Roisterer (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6, she looks mean in all the other ones. Khoikhoi 04:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 or 7, unless she is well-known for frowning. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 (I assume this is the infobox image?) - clearest shot  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 is my choice as it is clear picture.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 2 —SpacemanSpiff
• 0 --Pdfpdf (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 0 - shows the follow through of a pitch or I guess "bowl" Dincher (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • a) Huh? As Sandahl says, selecting "0" means "none of them". --Pdfpdf (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • b) Well, it ain't a "pitch". "Shows the follow through of the bowling action" is FAR too wordy, and sounds pretentious. You raise a good point!! Perhaps the easiest solution is to say: "Shows the follow through"? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 0 none of them.—Sandahl (♀) 03:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 is a more fluid picture.--Sarastro1 (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 0 none of them
• 0 —Dark 06:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd go 2. Privatemusings (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Bastique ^demandez 00:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 –MuZemike 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 but crop the mud and tarp. Abecedare (talk) 06:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Khoikhoi 04:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Clearer face  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 is my preferrence.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 shows the bowling action much better. You would be using a different image to show her face anyway. --Dweller (talk) 08:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 2 —SpacemanSpiff
• 0 --Pdfpdf (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 - figure occupies more of the frame Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Huh? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 - same as Ruhr Dincher (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Errrrr. OK, I admit it. I'm confused. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 —Sandahl (♀) 20:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 is more compact.--Sarastro1 (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I like the follow-through on 2. Grandmasterka 06:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 —Dark 06:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 - but not a great shot Privatemusings (talk) 04:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Either -- Y not? 18:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Like 1's crop better, but 2 has the lead room. Either —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Bastique ^demandez 00:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 –MuZemike 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1, but she's not batting. It looks like she's hitting the ball one-handed for some sort of fielding drill. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 15:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 --Roisterer (talk) 03:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Abecedare (talk) 06:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1. Khoikhoi 04:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 Rin tin tin 1996 (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1. —Aaroncrick (talk) 06:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Better ratio  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 is perfect.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Very strong 0. Both lousy, though not the photographer's fault. Who the hell bats like that? She was just messing about in the nets. Either image would be misleading for someone who doesn't know what batting looks like. --Dweller (talk) 08:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 1 or 11 —SpacemanSpiff
• Dunno - too much choice --Pdfpdf (talk) 11:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 10 good action. Dincher (talk) 01:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 11 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 11 for me -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 10 —Sandahl (♀) 20:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 10 or possibly 9.--Sarastro1 (talk) 21:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 definitely. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 or 10 hamiltonstone (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 —Dark 06:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 -- Y not? 18:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1, but I've added a retouched version at File:Alyssa Healy catching rt.jpg, as I was having fun. - Bilby (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 by a liddle bit. Privatemusings (talk) 03:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 3 first, 1 second choice —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6 –MuZemike 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 is good for showing who she is, 5 has a nice balance between her body and the ball. Too much space in the others. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 or 5. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 or 9 Abecedare (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 or 10. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1. Khoikhoi 04:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 is my choice.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 is a great shot. Good concentration, face clear, stance easily discerned, hand position etc. Excellent. --Dweller (talk) 08:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 2 —SpacemanSpiff
• 2 - don't need to see that water bottle Dincher (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 if the water bottle is cropped? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1: agree with Pdfpdf.--Sarastro1 (talk) 21:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 if cropped Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 —Dark 06:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Privatemusings (talk) 03:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 if cropped. 2 is an awkward body shape. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Echo what cryptic said. Abecedare (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1. Khoikhoi 05:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 is my preference as 2 is not clear.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 4 —SpacemanSpiff
• Hard one. Don't like the backgrounds of 1-4. Do like seeing the ball in all of them. Maybe 5 or 6?? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Have uploaded an edit of 5. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 - --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 —Dark 06:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 Privatemusings (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5. It's easy to find the ball and her arm position looks better than in 6. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 Abecedare (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5. Khoikhoi 05:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 it is.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6. Extended finger is interesting. --Dweller (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 seems most natural. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 1 —SpacemanSpiff
• 1 - a different color. Dincher (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 - yeah, like the pyjamas - particularly given the other photos do nothing for me. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 - --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 - can see her face best Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 but needs a crop. Why is it these 20 year olds look like 14? ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 —Dark 06:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 but crop out the LGLGLGLGLG boundary -- Y not? 18:29, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 (and echo the mild confusion about the schoolboy look ;-) Privatemusings (talk) 03:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 or 5 Abecedare (talk) 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 (crop?)  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 is good.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 1 —SpacemanSpiff
• 1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• pass --Pdfpdf (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 - --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 —Dark 06:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 --User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1, but retouched version at file:Jess_Cameron_catching_rt.jpg. - Bilby (talk) 08:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Abecedare (talk) 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 3 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Khoikhoi 05:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 no doubt.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1, sure. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 1 or 3 —SpacemanSpiff
• 1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 - has some depth perspective in it. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Did a crop on 1 with a shadow/highlight adjustment. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 3 --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 or 4. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 —Dark 06:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 Abecedare (talk) 06:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 5 is my choice as it shows completed action.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 2 —SpacemanSpiff
• 1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 hamiltonstone (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 —Dark 06:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 (shows the spectacles most clearly!) Abecedare (talk) 06:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Khoikhoi 05:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 it has to be.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 1 or 4 —SpacemanSpiff
• 6 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• What's with the right hand index finger? --Pdfpdf (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6 but needs a crop. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6 —Dark 06:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 --User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 3 or 6 Abecedare (talk) 06:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 6. Khoikhoi 05:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 3 (pref) or 6  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 4 or 5 is my prefrence--Nvvchar (talk) 10:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC

• 2 —SpacemanSpiff
• 2 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I rather like 1 - a real action shot. 2 is good too. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Doesn't need a thing. Good capture. :) Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:49, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 12:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 —Dark 06:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 Abecedare (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 1 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2 —Aaroncrick (talk) 06:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2  Chzz  ►  03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 2. Khoikhoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]