User talk:Xrimonciam
March 2024
Hello, I'm Jtrrs0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Subculture, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for raising the concern. I will take a second look at it then add the relevant reference. Xrimonciam (talk) 17:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mejja, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, your concern is well noted. Thank you. Xrimonciam (talk) 05:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Graham87 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Your editing pattern is highly suspicious; Wikipedia editing is all about quality over quantity. The fact that you even thought this was a good edit shows extreme incompetence. You are not welcome here. Graham87 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm, I thought you were spamming low-quality graphic design sites but [[this was actually a good edit. Your editing pattern is still ridiculous for a new user and the fact that you had to be warned *twice* about sources is concerning. Graham87 (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Concerning the previous warnings, I made sure I included sources to my edits at all times. My edits on graphic design sites were all source-based therefore I do not understand why you thou thought me incompetent. Additionally, am I still blocked? Please clarify your concerns. Xrimonciam (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, Graham87, this looks like it may have been a misunderstanding? Valereee (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not all references are reliable sources by Wikipedia's standards. famousgraphicdesigners.org (which you added to David Carson's article) is just a random website that may well borrow heavily from Wikipedia; it has no reputation for fact-checking that makes it in any way reliable. In contrast, The Guardian, which you added to Colin Forbes's page, is a long-lasting and widely respected newspaper that absolutely is a reliable source. I've unblocked you because my block was largely based on a misunderstanding, but I'm still highly concerned about your editing speed and some of your referencing practices. Graham87 (talk) 15:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm, I thought you were spamming low-quality graphic design sites but [[this was actually a good edit. Your editing pattern is still ridiculous for a new user and the fact that you had to be warned *twice* about sources is concerning. Graham87 (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)