User talk:Wikiwarrior00

June 2024

Hello, I'm Walsh90210. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Resurrection of Jesus seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walsh90210 (talk) 04:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Resurrection of Jesus seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia articles are not meant to evangelise non-Christians; they must also include perspectives that do not hold a belief in the resurrection of Christ as well as those that do. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Resurrection of Jesus, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 18:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwarrior00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

didn't see the warning, new to editing, have also made useful contributions, such as to Travis meyer, Rogers State university, and neosho and verdigris rivers

Decline reason:

Your useful edits do not outweigh your edits to articles related to Christianity, which were disruptive. That, combined with your username(which, while okay in terms of policy, suggests you are here to be a Christian warrior) 331dot (talk) 08:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, for proper discussion flow. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 08:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwarrior00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to politely ask to be unblocked. I am still learning about editing wikipedia, and feel as though I can make useful edits in the future. In fact, whenever I realized I was blocked, I was about to edit a page that had typos. Whenever I saw any page that needs correcting, I would fix it. If you let me have another chance, I believe that you will see I can make useful contribution to the wikipedia community.

Decline reason:

This does absolutely nothing to address the concerns listed by 331dot. Yamla (talk) 20:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still aren't addressing your disruptive edits to Christianity and you still aren't addressing your username, which indicates you are here to be a Christian warrior. You've wasted two unblock requests so far and appear to be wasting a third. You don't have an unlimited number of unblock requests and may lose talk page access if you refuse to address the concerns. I strongly suggest you take down your open unblock request (not the others, you aren't allowed to touch those) until you are willing and able to address the concerns. --Yamla (talk) 21:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if I "took it down" or not. I attempted to though. Wikiwarrior00 (talk) 21:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did. Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 21:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]