User talk:Whothatwhothatwhothstboi

Hello, I'm Estar8806. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:Priya 43434. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Profane language should be avoided at all costs while communicating with other editors. Thanks, estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry. I was just so upset. Priya keeps changing the accurate edits to wrong things. It has been pissing me off. If she stops doing that, I wouldn't have to be so harsh. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 23:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong answer. You can be civil. You're getting upset about a TV show. --Onorem (talk) 05:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not about the show. The audacity to keep changing the wikipedia page. I worked hard to keep it updated and accurate, but she keeps changing it to innacurate material. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whothatwhothatwhothstboi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Udaariyaan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 04:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Udaariyaan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm not the first user to revert your unnecessary, unexplained, unverified, and excessively detailed edits in this article. You want to update some number? Do it--but not while adding loads of redundant detail please. Drmies (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh of course! Sorry about that. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 06:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I would not advise restoring this WP:FANCRUFT again without consensus. See WP:ONUS. CNMall41 (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am not really familiar with Wiki rules. I am just here to make sure the plot and the cast are accurate with ITV show articles. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]