User talk:Whoamireally1234

Welcome!

Hello, Whoamireally1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Enzowhism, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 13:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 13:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Enzowhism. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Whoamireally1234! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Enzowhism. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD G2. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Enzowhism, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Enzowhism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this cites no sources to indicate notability of this "newly founded" philosophy, and I can find none - see talk.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I have removed the speedy-deletion tag, as I do not think your article qualifies for that, but it is still not acceptable because Wikipedia requires article subjects to be notable, which is not a subjective opinion but means that the subject has "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." It is not Wikipedia's role to promote anything new - see No Original Research and Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]