User talk:Wehaweha

September 2023

Hello, I'm ChrisWx. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Her Majesty's Theatre, Melbourne have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChrisWx (talk - contribs) 16:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chalmers University of Technology. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chalmers University of Technology was changed by Wehaweha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905731 on 2023-09-02T16:31:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Binion Hoard, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Binion Hoard was changed by Wehaweha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939891 on 2023-09-02T16:34:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 16:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wehaweha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. My kids were using the computer and made the disruptive edits we meant to use this account for some legitimate edits and help write an encyclopedia and I'm talking to my kids and sayd that they should not do this because our account got blocked because they wrote funny things in articles. I'm asking for an unblock now and possibly being able to edit again. I told the kids that our household is now blocked from editing wikipedia due to this and they are no longer allowed to use the computer. If unblocked We will make articles better and removing vandalism instead. Cheers, Wehaweha (talk) 16:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you say other people have had access to this account(and curiously only six minutes after it was created), it is now compromised and no longer able to be unblocked. Please see WP:COMPROMISED for more information. 331dot (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.