User talk:Waggie/Archives/2016/January

Hi Chris,

Will you join me in re-constructing the Request for comments before opening it up to vote?

(please say yes, please say yes, please say yes.)

--Potguru (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Potguru! Firstly, I'm very happy to help as best I can, but we should discuss what you mean by "reconstruct" first. We need to be EXTREMELY careful as involved editors how we participate in the discussion and about what actions we take. Participating in the polling, and adding comments is fine. As is minor reformatting of the the discussion to help clarity and accuracy. It is important to let the process take place of it's own accord (including having enough time pass, which can be up to 30 days). There are certain things we can do, and certain things we can't. Also, in an RfC, voting happens immediately. This is what is taking place now in the "Comments Welcomed Here" section. The "Discussion of Above Comments" section is where commentary on the RfC and responses are being posted.

For an example of another RfC, check: Infobox RfC, Religion in infoboxes

A couple of things to note about RfCs:

From Wikpedia Policys and Guidelines, Good Practice for Proposals: "Ending a discussion requires careful evaluation of the responses to determine the consensus. This does not require the intervention of an administrator, but may be done by any sufficiently experienced independent editor (an impartial editor not involved in the discussion) who is familiar with all of the policies and guidelines that relate to the proposal."

And also There are several ways that RfCs end (emphasis added to the applicable item):

1. The question may be withdrawn by the poster (e.g., if the community's response became obvious very quickly).
2. It may be moved to another dispute resolution forum, such as mediation.
3. The RfC participants can agree to end it at any time.
4. It can be formally closed by any uninvolved editor.

Please review and we'll proceed as appropriate. :) Hope all is well!

Chrisw80 (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting on Anna's input. As a noob whose been warned and blocked I am afraid to be bold, I await YOUR decision --Potguru (talk) 22:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

|}

A tag has been placed on Kanikai Sami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
518		N1 (rocket) (talk)	Add sources
369		Cylon (Battlestar Galactica) (talk)	Add sources
49		Severino Montano (talk)	Add sources
96,594		Spider-Man: No Way Home (talk)	Add sources
3,502		Kajal Aggarwal (talk)	Add sources
279		Werner von Fritsch (talk)	Add sources
152		Religare (talk)	Cleanup
1,066		SPECTRE (talk)	Cleanup
23		VM Labs (talk)	Cleanup
1,447		Bane (DC Comics) (talk)	Expand
9,105		Academy Awards (talk)	Expand
195		Isabeli Fontana (talk)	Expand
146		Rejection of evolution by religious groups (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
75		Democratic Union for Integration (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
32		Konix Multisystem (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,129		Electoral Count Act (talk)	Merge
4		Prelude in E minor, Op. 11, No. 4 (Scriabin) (talk)	Merge
53		Saif Sporting Club (talk)	Merge
3,336		Anushka Shetty (talk)	Wikify
12		Shqip.com (talk)	Wikify
198		Smartmatic (talk)	Wikify
3		Sokol Shameti (talk)	Orphan
13		Communication services sector reshuffle (talk)	Orphan
4		Karma Phuntsok (talk)	Orphan
384		Central Depository Services (talk)	Stub
1,686		Rashmi Rocket (talk)	Stub
1,328		Milly Shapiro (talk)	Stub
9		Yellow Jack (talk)	Stub
23		Elliot Graham (talk)	Stub
25		Bota Sot (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]