User talk:Vchimpanzee
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 60
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023
- Three new partners
- Google Scholar integration
- How to track partner suggestions
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 61
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024
- Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
- 1Lib1Ref results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
"Clorinda (Once Upon a Time)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Clorinda (Once Upon a Time) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Clorinda (Once Upon a Time) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 62
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024
- IEEE and Haaretz now available
- Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
- Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Swift and football
Hi. The piece of information you added to Cultural impact of Taylor Swift has been moved to a better place in the Public image of Taylor Swift. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 20:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't agree but at least you're now trying to discuss.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I do not appreciate passive aggressive comments such as this one. I always try to discuss. Maybe do not grandstand so much, and try to give the benefit of doubt. Maybe I missed the notification from that talk page discussion or I did not get notified at all (it was the latter case, actually). Regards. ℛonherry☘ 12:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it that way, but you didn't discuss and I don't know why.
- I do not appreciate passive aggressive comments such as this one. I always try to discuss. Maybe do not grandstand so much, and try to give the benefit of doubt. Maybe I missed the notification from that talk page discussion or I did not get notified at all (it was the latter case, actually). Regards. ℛonherry☘ 12:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I used the template which I assumed gave you a notification. I apologize if I didn't try harder.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize too. Even if I didn't get notified, I must've checked the talk page, just in case, before making the edit. ℛonherry☘ 18:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. All is well, then. I disagree with the decision to put all that information in the other article, but it would be pretty hard to convince others. To me it looks like "impact" not "image" but if the information was already split, there's not much point in trying.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize too. Even if I didn't get notified, I must've checked the talk page, just in case, before making the edit. ℛonherry☘ 18:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- I used the template which I assumed gave you a notification. I apologize if I didn't try harder.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)