User talk:Valjean

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.
Compare Wikipedias How to find word count

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people climate change pseudoscience and fringe science He should not be given alerts for those areas.

This page has been mentioned by multiple media organizations: Ashe Schow (November 25, 2015). "Wikipedia founder advocates for updating policies following 'The Hunting Ground' controversy". Washington Examiner. Retrieved February 8, 2020. Another editor, whose username is BullRangifer, suggested Wikipedia not become "a kangaroo court or lynching" by rushing to ban accounts who break COI. BullRangifer suggested following seven steps to determine whether "The Hunting Ground" crew member should be banned and whether his edits should be removed. Some of the steps included how he handled questions related to his edits and whether he stuck to discussion pages to ask for edits rather than making them himself. Marcus Gilmer (October 3, 2018). "Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news". Mashable. Retrieved October 5, 2018. Support. If anything, it's even more unreliable than the Daily Mail, as they at least use trained journalists, whereas Breitbart is a fringe propaganda organization which lets its extreme partisan bias get in the way of how it reports things, and whether it does so, just as Fox News does. It too should be deprecated, but let's start with Breitbart (and InfoWars). — BullRangifer 17:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC) Alexander Hall (August 13, 2020). "Report: Wikipedia Editors Censoring Evidence Supporting Michael Flynn". NewsBusters. Retrieved August 15, 2020. Liberal user Valjean responded by condemning this revelation as 'conspiracy theories' and 'part of a cover-up,' even 'when it comes from the now-sitting government of the USA.' Valjean specified that 'Nothing coming from Trump's Justice Department, FBI, CIA, anything, can be trusted.' Breitbart alleged that Valjean, formerly under the name 'BullRangifer' has been 'previously involved in slanting articles about the Russia investigation.' Raymond Sturman (October 23, 2024). "Top 5 Editing Conflicts in Wikipedia Pages on Religion". World Religion News. Retrieved October 24, 2024. Located on the Catholic Church Wikipedia talk page, the screenshot below details a recent discussion of the tension between the Roman Catholic Church and other branches of Catholicism. Editor 'Valjean' is protesting that the word 'Roman' has been removed from the title, arguing that there are other branches of Catholicism, while the Roman Catholic Church says it is the real Catholic Church.

Welcome to Valjean's talk page! TBIP

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32

[2] Andre🚐 19:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we've known that he was accused of lying since Spring, but now he has actually confessed. Nice! Giuliani has some unsavory Russian intelligence accomplices in his efforts to cover-up Trump's misdeeds and cast the blame on others, such as Biden and Ukraine. Nasty business. Our content that says that "no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden has been found" (paraphrase) is still accurate. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, your sharp mind is needed at Talk:E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump#"Falsely_stated"??. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check it out when I have some time. Andre🚐 20:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please see the edit summary for this edit. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Account has now been blocked for making legal threats. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Your criticism carries no weight with us as long as you show so much evidence you [are a biased hypocrite]."

"You have been lied to."

"Never repeat what you [posted to me] ever again."

Now that the shoe is on the other foot "...maybe you should get better sources and new friends." Chompaydm (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

? What are you talking about? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You know what you did. 2601:248:C000:147A:105D:AF20:6926:3AB0 (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 13:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bring this up again, but when I said "User:Valjean told me I need to get consensus on the talk page first." (link here: [3]), I actually meant to say "User:GiantSnowman told me I need to get consensus on the talk page first.", per this revision: [4]. 123957a (talk) 11:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

Administrator changes

• Arcticocean
• Wugapodes

Euryalus

CheckUser changes

• Firefly
• L235

Oversighter changes

• Firefly
• Guerillero
• L235
• Moneytrees

Technical news

• Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
• A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.

---

Is there a reason you removed this comment? It was reasonably on-topic and there is no WP:ECR sanction in place. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I could be mistaken, but it looked like the same type of IP comment we have removed on sight several times, possibly from the same person (hence my not repeating previous explanations this time). Like I said, I could be mistaken. Maybe it was on another page. Feel free to restore it and answer it. I'd like to see how you deal with it in a better way. I have no doubt you can, and I can learn from your example. It's just so tiring dealing with these repeated attempts to push unsourced claims and not go by what RS say. I will try to be more careful in the future. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not plainly disruptive just ignore it and trust the closer to weigh those responses as they should be. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that makes sense. Sorry about that. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

• Jarry1250
• Lethe

CheckUser changes

• AmandaNP
• Drmies

Oversighter changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
• A series of 22 mini-RFCs that double-checked consensus on some aspects and improved certain parts of the administrator elections process has been closed (see the summary of the changes).
• A request for comment is open to gain consensus on whether future administrator elections should be held.

Technical news

• A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
• Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous

• The 2025 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, Arcticocean, Ameisenigel, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, Galahad, Nehaoua, Renvoy, Revi C., RoySmith, Teles and Zafer as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2025 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 1234qwer1234qwer4, AramilFeraxa, Daniuu, KonstantinaG07, MdsShakil and XXBlackburnXx.

---

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Russiagate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Your edit summary was "archiving", however that page does not appear to have an archive set up... Electricmemory (talk) 21:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Electricmemory:, it's obviously not vandalism, so use a different template, or better yet, don't template the regulars. I have just set up the archiving, but if I made a mistake, I'd appreciate help to fix it. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, maybe that was a tad harsh, however there is no archiving in place for that page, so something didn't quite work. Electricmemory (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see the archive page you created, but there's no mention of it on the parent page. Electricmemory (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added code to that talk page, but the archive link is not showing, so I must have done something wrong. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, but I've got no clue how to fix that. I shouldn't have templated you either (most of my talk page dealings are with low-edit count IP vandals, so it's a bit of a habit) but have a nice day :) Electricmemory (talk) 22:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It has been fixed. I forgot to add a bit. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No no, thank you for all your work on the article! Bishonen | tålk 18:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

That's an important addition. Most people are likely unaware of the difference. Bullshitters are even more insidious and dangerous than normal liars. We live in dangerous times. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:46, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]