User talk:TheUserOfWiki14Robbie

This user is a member of the My Chemical Romance task force.

This user is a member of WikiProject Post-hardcore.

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TheUserOfWiki14Robbie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "MattFlynnForPresident". The reason given for MattFlynnForPresident's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts + vandalism".

• Blocking administrator: Elockid (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Autoblock cleared. You should be able to edit now. Elockid ^(Talk) 00:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Just Like You (Falling in Reverse album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max Green. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed your edit on the Green Day timeline reverting the color changes I made. I will admit that purple is a quite prominent drum color, but I would still say that orange is much more common, and I believe it should be orange, but until there is an official scheme in place for that, I'm not going to argue about it. However, I am very certain that pink is the more commonly accepted and more widely used color for backing vocals as opposed to yellow. I would appreciate it if we could work together to sort this out, and at the very least start using pink for backing vocals now, and save the drums and keyboards thing for later if you are quite adamant about it. Thank you for your time, and happy editing!! —DLManiac (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paco, provide a reason/edit summary next time you revert someone's completely valid edit. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 21:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted a good faith edit you made on this article, regarding future albums. Please read WP:CRYSTALBALL. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheUserOfWiki14Robbie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have learned my lesson and will no longer be a sock puppet and use Wiki responsively PacoDaKing14Sportz (talk) 13:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that I just indef blocked one of your other socks that you had an unblock template on, I'm not inclined to believe you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electric Century is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric Century (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:God, If You Are Above.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Electric Century EP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please check the date of taking this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ray_Toro_2011.png There are two dates on its page - 2011 and 2014. Since the upload is later than both, it is not obvious which one is correct. Thank you. JiriMatejicek (talk) 16:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Holographic Sands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Like Phantoms, Forever.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Murphy (offensive tackle) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Murphy (offensive tackle) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kip Edwards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kip Edwards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]