User talk:TheQuestionerPro

Welcome!

Hello, TheQuestionerPro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! John of Reading (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheQuestionerPro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I did get a little angry perhaps. But I am not a sock puppet of some-one like "Technoquat". It have better stuff to do than make some 10 or 20 accounts. keep me blocked, but do not accuse me of being a sockpuppet of "Technoquat". TheQuestionerPro (talk) 13:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After speaking with you on IRC and with a checkuser, it seems to be true that you were not one of Technoquat's accounts. That said, you've admitted (and CU has supported) that you were a WOLfan112 sock, and this block will remain. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My last account was [1], never blocked!

See [2]!