User talk:TheKrazyDude

Sorry to undo your edits at Tikka Khan. Perhaps it is best to discuss calling him "Butcher of Baluchistan" and "Butcher of Bengal" on the discussion page first. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hamoodur Rahman Commission, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikireader41 (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Air Forces/OF/United Kingdom

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Air Forces/OF/United Kingdom, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Your edits can be seen here. — MrDolomite • Talk 15:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Saiful Azam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vipin Hari || talk 06:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Saiful Azam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Supertouch (talk) 11:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Bangladesh Army, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A few thoughts in reference to your recent edits to the Saudi Arabian Army page:
1. Please see WP:OVERLINK. Not every instance of a word needs to be linked to the relevant wiki article. In most cases, only the first example of the word needs to be linked. Linking every example of 'Main battle tank' (note that it should not be capitalized, either) is counter productive. You may want to read WP:MOS in general.
2. Not every individual type of equipment needs a separate table. This adds clutter and unnecessary text/bulk to the page. In many cases, broadly similar types can be grouped together. IE All armoured fighting vehicles can be put together, there doesn't need to be separate MBT, APC and IFV tables. I realize the page was already in this state to some degree, but your recent edits only added to that. You'll notice that the most commonly used table for military equipment has a 'Type' column for just that reason. It's redundant to list type, and have every type have its own table.
3. Please use the edit summary box when editing so that other editors can know what you did, and more importantly why you did it. Perfectly reasonable and logical edits can be reversed if there's no reasonable or clear explanation for why the edit was done. See WP:EDSUM.
-Jonathon A H (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously added the Mig-29's and JF-Thunder's in the aircraft inventory section. I'm wondering why you deleted it, since there is evidence that the EAF did in fact receive 40 Mig-29's and actually 30 Su-35's from Russia. Here's an article from Al-Jazeera:

http://www.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E7C35EA8-70EB-4C68-A1E2-22C357BA1CA8.htm (in the Air Force section)

Here's another article from an Egyptian newspaper:

http://www.elfagr.org/TestAjaxNews.aspx?nwsId=9482&secid=2568

It is also confirmed that Egypt is building JF-17's under license from Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atees (talk • contribs) 11:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Border Guards Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilkhana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be extremely careful when moving information around pages. I have just had to re-research and insert the original source of the Syrian Army orbat which you removed in the process of splitting the units to their own page. Please *do not* remove references. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of active aircraft of the Bangladesh Air Force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is redundant. Bangladesh Air Force contains an up-t--date inventory table. There is also List of active Bangladesh military aircraft. Duplication on this article is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Antiochus the Great (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheKrazyDude. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have made several changes in the articles Bangladesh Army, Bangladesh Navy and Bangladesh Air Force without any references. Verifiability is the most important feature of Wikipedia. Please provide independent and reliable sources to back up your claim or refrain from editing in Wikipedia. SRS 00 t@lk, 08:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]